Posted on 01/04/2012 9:28:40 AM PST by Absolutely Nobama
I must say, the 2012 Iowa Caucus was magnificent.
ABSOLUTELY magnificent.
You see, the good guys won for a change.
Mitt Commie failed and Jew hater Ron Paul was delivered a staggering defeat.
Now, before we get started, let's get a few things clear. Number one, I don't shill for candidates. I have my favorite candidate and you have yours. In this column, I will never tell you who to vote for. I will always tell you who I think is pond scum (like Mitt Commie, like former Obama syocphant Jon Huntsman, and last, and certainly least, Stormfront candidate Ron Paul), but I will never tell you who to vote for. (You're an adult, I trust you'll act accordingly.) Number two, I am fully aware that the Iowa Caucus is not that big of a deal. There's no need to remind me of that. (If you don't believe me, ask President Huckabee.)
The failure of Mitt Commie was mind boggling. Here was a guy with a campaign budget that was bigger than the GDP of El Salvador, who had been campaigning since John McLame's whimpering defeat in 2008, and had a cable news station (FNC, aka the Fox Neocon Channel) in the tank for him, and has a super PAC to do his hatchet work for him.......and yet........he barely beat Rick Santorum by 8 votes. Yep, you read that right, 8 measly votes. (It should be noted, that until very recently, Rick Santorum's campaign was being ignored by everyone not named Mark Levin and had 68 cents and pocket lint to its name.) Even uglier for Mitt Commie was the fact that he was unable to drive a wooden stake into the heart of nemesis Newt Gingrich's campaign. Despite being carpet bombed by Romney's PAC operatives and Establishment hacks, Gingrich placed a respectable fourth and lived to fight another day. In other words---Mitt Commie choked.
Meanwhile, in Red Skull Ron Paul's Fourth Reich, the Paultards are tickled Code Pinko.(Either that, or they're stoned out of their minds yet again.) They think their Fuhrer has won a great victory over the "neocon bankster Zionist war mongers" by placing third. In actuality, this is a resounding, Stalingrad-like defeat for Herr Doktor. See, Iowa laws allow anyone to change their party affiliation at the door of any caucus and vote. So in theory, every liberaltarian, every Green, every 9/11 Truther, every Neo-Nazi, every malcontent, and every so-called "independent" in the state of Iowa could have showed up and dragged the Surrender Monkey's carcass across the finish line. But they didn't. Despite the "money bombs", the "spamming", the "trolling", making pests of themselves on talk radio shows, and other Brownshirt-like behavior, RuPaul (H/T: Mark Levin) and his flunkies have failed and failed big time. Third place in a contest whose rules favor you is a complete and utter joke, much like saying Herr Doktor is a Conservative.
Let me repeat: No, I'm not shilling for anyone (as of yet, I'm still undecided) and yes, I know Iowa's not that big of a deal. However, a win's a win and I'll take 'em any way I can get 'em. If you don't win, you can't keep it classy and say things like this:
HEY RINOs AND PAULTARDS! IN YOUR FACE, DORKS!
Great responses, too bad they are intellectually challenged, and cannot comprehend the truth.
Ping away, bro.
“Thank you for dragging civil political disourse on a conservative site down to the level somewhere between DU and kindergarten.”
Perfect response.
That was just some random links talking about it that I pulled up from a simple Google search.
Funny how you only looked at one link. Try the others that have a lot more recent dates.
BTW, 2005 Paul was not running for President.
There’s a lot of unsufferable going on lately, it seems! :)
For the record you say Paul does not understand the Service.
He is the only one who served in the military. None of the other candidates did not.
So you say the people who never served know more than someone who has??? LOL!
I have linked sites that validate my point. You don’t provide any evidence to back up your claim, and all you say is look it up. LOL!
The Founding Fathers did not envision us in endless wars. They were strongly against it.
BTW, most in the military do not want a war because they have to do the dirty work. We have over 900 bases world wide. You cannot possibly believe all 900 are needed given the fact that our country is going broke? We have become like Rome.
Sanatorium is a joke. How he won it with less than 100 people at any event is astounding. It stinks of corruption.
Here is a link you might enjoy.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/2829075/posts?page=1
Perfect response.
Not exactly, I had a typo... "disourse = discourse". :)
OK, A-, then.
Happy dance......
:)
This is my second bug zapper thread! Yay-hoo!
Wish I had known you for the first one. You’re actually very good at this, sweetie. Pay no attention to the dilettantes! You’re doin’ it right.
What a twisted freak that one was (not the zot message, the zottee). “You know who’s behind all this anti-semitism? The Jews!” Good riddance.
BTW, the terms “RINOs” and “Paultards” — redundant.
It was the same one where I asked to join the ZOT! ping list.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2816719/posts
“Pay no attention to the dilettantes!”
Never have, never will.
NO COMPROMISE! NO RETREAT! NO SURRENDER!
Thanks, FRiend!
Thanks!
The title says one thing....
However, when you go to the open source link it validates Ron Paul’s claim.
Tell me what other candidate gets higher donations?
You can all see it in Open Secrets. Compare to the other candidates.
Okay so you are now saying one of the other Candidates is more like a founding father than Paul?
Here is a link to US Federal spending.
You will Defense Budget is 20% or 1/5 of the entire budget.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:U.S._Federal_Spending_-_FY_2007.png
The requested document does not exist on this server.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
