[grey_whiskers]

Compare and contrast this with your post #87, in which you seem to imply that the similarity of other species (say, cats) to humans in regards to "empathy" is indicative that either "animals have souls" or "souls are a human idea, made up etc."

And now you claim that "religions" is a word used to group ideas which are merely made up in the service of justifying behaviour.

Huh.

To boomerang the classic atheist argument against the existence of God, (if morality exists God adds nothing to it, and can be eliminated by Occam's razor) --

Why then should religion have begun, (or, for that matter, persist) if animals show these behaviours already without resorting to *anything* to justify them? (Whence the need to justify what is by your accounting instinctive? And -- probing deeper -- why would anything need "justifying"? Where did the concept of justifying come from in the first place? Humans are animals, right?

Quit contradicting yourself.

Cheers!

[Alamo-Girl]

Great catch, dear grey_whiskers!