Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Just4Him
There was a vile thread at the DUmp recently debating whether HIV-infected people should be held criminally liable for having sex with others; all permutations of this scenario.

Disgustingly, most posters there would side with this guy, blaming the "victims" for not being more responsible for themselves. Of course, it's not a "sides" issue at all. Sexual anarchy, by all, and the embrace of this diabolical world view is the evil.

40 posted on 12/31/2011 4:19:48 PM PST by fwdude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: fwdude
There was a vile thread at the DUmp recently debating whether HIV-infected people should be held criminally liable for having sex with others; all permutations of this scenario.

In Michigan, it's a felony to commit "sexual penetration" if you're knowingly HIV positive and don't disclose that to you're partner.

I'm not a big felony guy, but that needs to be on the books. On the same note, there's a lesson to all of us to be careful out there. Ladies, if you're guy is a switch hitter, run away before you can say Jack Robinson to borrow a term from Slap Shot.

55 posted on 12/31/2011 4:40:42 PM PST by Darren McCarty (Anybody but Romney or Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson