Any so called evidence that could be suspect, because it was planted disinformation such as photos or “witnesses”, I’ve personally eliminatd from consideration. What’s left is compelling. Photographs can be altered by photoshop and “witnesses” paid to lie. We now know that newspaper birth announcements were altered by film being spliced
If baby Barry was born in Hawaii, and mother and baby lived in Seattle, why would the State Department claim that her passport records for the early 1960s have been destroyed? If they lived in Seattle, why take correspondence courses from a nearby university? She wouldn’t, because they weren’t living in Seattle.
You fail to consider that if Stanley did take courses at the University of Washington, that information about her child and his birth information would be on file in the Washington States Department of Records. What? you ask? Because I am sure that Stanley Ann asked for state assistance and all of the information would have to be provided. A good detective could have it all there for us in a week.
See my reply #40. SADO took an extension course, likely a night course, NOT a correspondence course, which would have been tabulated separately on the transcript, if there were any.
State Dept said records prior to 1967 were destroyed but did not specify whether they were only records of an initial passport application from around 1965 or whether the records included an initial application from 1961 plus a renewal in 1965, IIRC.
In either case the passport records don't seem to me to have any effect on whether or not SADO was in WA beginning in late August of 1961 (she was, IMO). The passport records can only tell us whether she was somewhere else before then.
We do?
Would you please provide more information.
ML/NJ