Skip to comments.
Cold Fusion For Christmas?
ECat Site ^
| Dec 15 2011
| Admin
Posted on 12/17/2011 9:08:40 PM PST by Kevmo
I doubt it. Not this year anyway. However, after a seemingly disappointing period of no significant news regarding the cold fusion saga, mid-December has found this story once again springing to life.
Last week Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney mentioned cold fusion in an interview with the conservative publication the Washington Examiner link. As Governor Romney stumbled and bumbled and actually showed a poor grasp of the matter, it was likely that he was briefed about the matter by one of his “handlers” and encouraged to mention it in the interview. It is also likely that his associates have spoken to Republican colleague, Massachusetts state senator Bruce Tarr, who invited Andrea Rossi to Massachusetts for exploratory talks a couple of weeks ago. The nature of his Governor Romney’s (ex of Massachusetts) indicate a “trial balloon,” a statement made to gauge public interest and reaction. Yet, given in the context of his statement, a run for the Republican nomination to be a presidential candidate, his mere mention of the term “cold fusion” I think is significant.
I also need to point out here that the only two American politicians to mention cold fusion to date have been conservative Republicans, Governor Romney and Senator Tarr. One would have reasonably expected the subject to have been broached first by more liberal political figures like the President or independent Senator Bernie Sanders, or even a libertarian like Ron Paul, but so far they have remained remarkably silent about the matter. Of course, as mentioned in the previous article here, the President has his hands full with the Solyndra solar scandal, so perhaps it is thought prudent that not make any mention of something as controversial as cold fusion. I do not know what the excuse for the others is, with the “others” including a vast liberal portion of the Democratic party who have adopted green energy as part of their political mantra.
One segment of the U.S. Government who have not been so silent about cold fusion/LENR is the US Navy’s Space and Naval Warfare Systems Command (SPAWAR) . They have been working on this technology for nearly 20 years, with much of that research being led by Dr. Pamela Moiser-Boss. In a video from 2009 that has just surfaced in the blogosphere, members of this organization, including Dr. Boss, give a quite an extensive and informative presentation regarding their cold fusion/LENR work. That video is now available in the sidebar video player. In this video, members of SPAWAR explain this phenonomon AS A FACT. There is absolutely no equivocation with regards to their belief that this technology is real. Let me state that once again to reiterate…MEMBERS OF THE U.S. NAVY’S SPACE AND NAVAL WARFARE SYSTEMS COMMAND UNEQUIVOCALLY STATE THAT COLD FUSION/LENR IS A FACT!
Interestingly, at the outset of this presentation, given at the University of Missouri in 2009, a SPAWAR spokesman states: “We currently call it low-energy nuclear reactions. That may not be any more accurate than the term cold fusion…” I only bring this us because some in the blogosphere of late have gone to great lengths insisting that this is LENR not cold fusion. I find these efforts a complete waste of time in the context of the greater discussion. There are a host of mainstream scientists and journalists (a majority actually) who out of sheer ignorance continue to argue that this whole phenonomon is “junk” or “pathological science” and refuse to acknowledge data and evidence to the contrary. I strongly feel efforts should be directed at educating the ignorant with facts that refute mistaken notions instead of having largely pointless arguments about what terms to use to describe a very real technology.
Speaking of the aforementioned, and moving on to more important developments in the evolving cold fusion saga, the New Energy Times has recently posted an article entiled “Shell’s Interest Indicates Major Shift for LENR.” I think the title of the article speaks for itself. I would strongly encourage all to read this article. It is important because it not only indicates that large and powerful corporations are taking notice of this technology now but, according to the article, Shell did successful research into this field as far back as the 1990s.
While it is curious that NASA kept silent about successful cold fusion research dating back to 1989, it is not really surprising that a major oil company has. What is more surprising (or maybe not) is that Shell has decided to look into this again. I think it indicates a continuing undercurrent of interest of entities that extend far beyond the world of the narrow-mindness and ignorance of so many that claim to be in-the-know.
I would note that if you do plan to read the Shell article, I would do it sooner rather than later as a commenter has already requested that this article be taken down because apparently this information was confidential and its disclosure has been deemed “highly inappropriate.” The article also includes a new slide show (in PDF format) presentation that was part of NASA’s September 22 LENR workshop. This information documents in more detail NASA’s 1989 cold fusion experimentation.
As the grand finale to the new information that has emerged regarding cold fusion this Holiday Season, is a report of the Coherence 2011cold fusion conference held in Rome, Italy on December 14. This report was provided by Daniel Passerni of the 22Passi blog and may be found here. The report includes links to 10 presentations provided at the conference. Unfortunately for us Anglophones, this treasure trove of information is mostly in Italian. However, I have gone ahead and provided links to this information below for those who understand the language. These links can also be found at the link provided above to the 22Passi blog. The link has above is for the Google translated version of the page and it contains some important information in and of itself.
Perhaps of most interest are reports that Italian physicist Francesco Celani is now doing some very robust cold fusion work. He reports cells now operating in the 200% excess heat range for periods of weeks! He has been working with a variety of materials, including platinum and palladium, but seems to be getting the best results with…..nickel and hydrogen. Apparently he has worked very closely with Japanese researcher Yoshiaki Arata, whose public demonstration of his work in 2008 has served as the impetus, it is felt, for many other researchers including Andrea Rossi and Brian Ahern.
There is a lot of information buried in these reports and I would encourage all to take at them as much as possible. Admittedly they are hard to read because the Google translation is inexact. However, one tidbit that is of interest is a report that Ahern and Rossi worked together on a project for the U.S. Department of Defense since 2008! It is not clear how long this relationship latest or its extent. This is of course contrary to statements made by Rossi that he has never met Ahern and may provide a background for some of the contention between the two.
The whole Coherence Conference actually deserves an article of its owns but, unfortunately, time does not permit this right at the moment. The busy Holiday Season and personal matters prevent me from discussing it further at this time but I hope to have more to say about at a future date. I expect Tom Baccei to have some insights about it and to bring them to his articles in the coming days.
I just want to offer a public word of thanks to Tom Baccei for the content he has provided to this site in recent days. His contributions have been a great help to me personally and, by the look of the site page view counter and comment box, many of you are enjoying his contributions as well. I think he is bringing a refreshing take on this whole saga and I look forward to his continued contributions in the coming days.
Reference materials from Coherence 2011
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
___________________________________________
___________________________________________
Short URL for this page: http://wp.me/p1SDhJ-HK
Like this:
Be the first to like this post.
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Politics; Science
KEYWORDS: cmns; coldfusion; ecat; lenr
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-82 next last
To: exDemMom
"Your problem is that you want so badly to believe that Rossi is genuine that you're willing to overlook just about anything that contradicts that belief." Horse manure.
"So what if the Italians changed their laws specifying requirements for a degree? It's highly unlikely that such changes were very substantial as far as actual work required for a given degree. I especially doubt that the requirements for PhDs were made MORE strict than when Rossi supposedly attended university."
If you had bothered to do a bit of work, you would have found out that the changes were quite substantial. My impression was that a new degree was added that WAS the equivalent of a US doctorate.
"It also doesn't help your case to quote an Italian as saying that until 1986, the highest degree offered was a Master's. That is, in effect, saying that it was impossible for Rossi to even get a doctorate."
The Italian quote said that the degree was "dottore", which at that time was probably, in effort, EQUIVALENT to a US Masters degree, not that it was a Master's degree. European and American degree levels are NOT equivalent.
Again, you are assuming things without checking.
"Last, I will reiterate that the degree Rossi claims to have earned from the U of Milan, the "Dottore Magistrale in Filosofia", is a Master's degree in Philosophy. It not only is not a doctorate, it isn't even a science degree."
My degree says "Doctor of Philosophy". Does that make me a philsopher?? I certainly took a whole bunch of science classes. Without knowing what course work was taken, neither you nor I can know precisely what the overall background in science Rossi gained from his university work was. At "liberal arts" type universities, a degree can vary substantially between people even though the final title on the diploma says the same degree level was attained.
"I don't know about you, but I've never dealt with philosophers in the lab. It appears to me that the specific degree name was selected so as to convey the impression that Rossi has a level of education that he does not; the Italian words for "Master's degree in Philosophy" sure do look like the English words "Doctor of Philosophy". Too bad (for Rossi) that we have Google and can check these things out.
Maybe you should actually spend MORE time on Google. An actual "Masters degree in Philosophy" transates as "Laurea in Filosofia". "Doctors degree in Philosophy" translates precisely as "Dottore in Filosofia". Your assumptions are once again in error.
You must really have thunder thighs, as you spend so much time jumping to conclusions.
To: Wonder Warthog
You're going back and forth.
The problem is that Rossi is implying that he has a Doctorate degree. And the letter provided as evidence (why not a transcript? why not a certificate? maybe a letter is easier to PhotoShop?) states that the degree received is a Master's, not a Doctorate.
Since you don't seem to disagree that the degree shown is a Master's, not a Doctorate, why are you quibbling about that point?
As for the subject matter, the "Dottore Magistrali di Filosofia" translates to "Master's Degree in Philosophy." That is NOT the same as our "Doctorate of Philosophy." In the former, "Philosophy" is referring to an actual academic subject. In the case of our degree, "Philosophy" can be taken more literally as "Love of Knowledge." It strongly appears to me that Rossi is using the name of a degree awarded in the subject of Philosophy for the very reason that in English, a person unfamiliar with Italian degrees (and who doesn't know about Google Translate) could see it and think it is a PhD.
And what the heck are you explaining to me about how the same degree can be awarded for widely different subjects of study? Did you miss the part where I said that I have a PhD, the fact of which implies that I have at least a passing familiarity with the American university system? Gee, at my graduation ceremony, there was a woman receiving a PhD in piano studies. Like, what the heck does a person do to earn a PhD in piano studies??? I'll bet she didn't spend 8-10 hours per day in the lab like I did!
And thanks for the suggestion that I spend MORE time on Google. I already spend hours on Google every day; a few more won't hurt, right? As for the translation of "Dottore Magistrale di Filosofia", the translation you get depends in part in how you enter it into Google Translate. Word by word, it is "master's degree in philosophy". Also, if you look at the original pdf file (a translation of which I posted in reply #21, this thread), the "letter" actually states that the degree was awarded in Philosophy. Plus, the letter was generated by the humanities department. I don't know about you; I didn't even know where the humanities department was when I was getting my PhD in biochemistry and molecular biology. I doubt that physicists in general have any more interest in humanities than chemists.
62
posted on
12/21/2011 10:53:51 AM PST
by
exDemMom
(Now that I've finally accepted that I'm living a bad hair life, I'm more at peace with the world.)
To: exDemMom
That's a university in Italy ~ not Prince George's Community College in Maryland.
It's from way back in 1975 before the EU decided on a standardized categorization such as we have had in the USA for quite some time.
Your personal experience has nothing whatsoever to do with Italian universities then or now.
The "translation" of the terms in the degrees means nothing ~ they are IDEOMATIC EXPRESSIONS and have to be dealt with as a whole, and during the period the degrees were issued.
Frankly, the Internet hasn't been a lot of help in this ~ and I am surprised ~ totally flabbergasted in fact ~ that any Italian university could actually be teaching anybody about nuclear physics.
63
posted on
12/21/2011 3:02:38 PM PST
by
muawiyah
To: muawiyah
It's those damned tachyons messing with the dilithium crystals that are affecting the warp core making the toilets back up into the warp drives!
Quick, someone get on the intertubes and find out if our new engineer, Andrea Rossi knows what he is talking about or just has a new device to make Picard's Earl Gray.
From hospital intercom:
Muawiyah, time for your hourly ECT.
Many thanks to Dr. Demento.
64
posted on
12/21/2011 5:20:11 PM PST
by
Lx
(Do you like it, do you like it. Scott? I call it Mr. and Mrs. Tennerman chili.)
To: exDemMom
"The problem is that Rossi is implying that he has a Doctorate degree. And the letter provided as evidence (why not a transcript? why not a certificate? maybe a letter is easier to PhotoShop?) states that the degree received is a Master's, not a Doctorate." He DOES have a doctorate. Just because the Italian degree system of 1975 had a different level of required effort doesn't change that. Again, the Italian response I am referring to specifically says....""dottore" entitles Rossi to claim the title of Dr."
"Since you don't seem to disagree that the degree shown is a Master's, not a Doctorate, why are you quibbling about that point?"
I "do" disagree. There is a major difference between the granted academic title and level of effort required to attain that degree.
As for the subject matter, the "Dottore Magistrali di Filosofia" translates to "Master's Degree in Philosophy."
It does NOT! Copy and past the phrase into your friend "Google Translate" and see what comes out.
"That is NOT the same as our "Doctorate of Philosophy." In the former, "Philosophy" is referring to an actual academic subject. In the case of our degree, "Philosophy" can be taken more literally as "Love of Knowledge."
No, it isn't the same. But courses of study can vary significantly with level of knowledge attained.
"It strongly appears to me that Rossi is using the name of a degree awarded in the subject of Philosophy for the very reason that in English, a person unfamiliar with Italian degrees (and who doesn't know about Google Translate) could see it and think it is a PhD.
Speculation.
"And what the heck are you explaining to me about how the same degree can be awarded for widely different subjects of study? Did you miss the part where I said that I have a PhD, the fact of which implies that I have at least a passing familiarity with the American university system?
My point is that within specific type of degree, vastly different levels of expertise can be gained depending on the courses taken, not that "the same degree can be awarded for widely different areas of study". You've got my point completely backwards.
One student trying for a degree in "Philosphy" might take a large number of science courses, while another student might take no science courses at all.....and still end up with the same academic title on exiting the process.
"Gee, at my graduation ceremony, there was a woman receiving a PhD in piano studies. Like, what the heck does a person do to earn a PhD in piano studies??? I'll bet she didn't spend 8-10 hours per day in the lab like I did!
Take two students majoring in "piano studies". One takes courses in acoustics, physics, mathematics, and the study of the science of the piano. The other takes music appreciation classes. Same degree.
"I didn't even know where the humanities department was when I was getting my PhD in biochemistry and molecular biology.
Shame. My university REQUIRED a certain number of humanities courses. I sometimes regret that I didn't take more...but didn't have time.
"I doubt that physicists in general have any more interest in humanities than chemists.
LOL. Look up the biographies of any of the top-level physicists (or chemists for that matter). Most of them have a VERY strong interest in the humanities. Much more so than humanities majors have in science.
To: exDemMom
"Gee, at my graduation ceremony, there was a woman receiving a PhD in piano studies. Like, what the heck does a person do to earn a PhD in piano studies??? I'll bet she didn't spend 8-10 hours per day in the lab like I did! I disagree.
I had a music theory teacher who was a PhD. She was a musical genius. The math for music is incredibly complicated; it's not just playing an instrument if you want to learn composing. Moving through the circle of fifths or backwards through fourths isn't easy even though there are rules. The program I went through was extremely rigorous. I was taking Calculus and Physics at the same time and believe me, I'd rather have the teacher hold up an F in calculus than have the teacher play something of mine that sounded terrible.
Music has its own math, its own language and its own rules. It's not the same as picking up and playing guitar hero. You've got to have the correct key, the correct time, correct tempo, know what the Italian words are for faster, arpegiating a chord, loud or soft, what the dots at the end of some bars mean not to mention the D.S. Al Coda.
If you know the movable 'do' system, you can create any key's scales such as major, minor, melodic minor, Harmonic Minor, Lydian, Phrygian and so on as well as any type of chord from a simple 1st, third and fifth to adding suspended notes and sevenths.
Believe me, we weren't judged because we were able to finish a piece of music as an exercise, we were judged on original music which a lot of people took really hard. Keep in mind we're not talking about popular music, we had to write music written in the style of the period of the late 1700s to some modern classical music which to me sounded like cr*p.
66
posted on
12/22/2011 11:04:31 AM PST
by
Lx
(Do you like it, do you like it. Scott? I call it Mr. and Mrs. Tennerman chili.)
To: Lx
"Gee, at my graduation ceremony, there was a woman receiving a PhD in piano studies. Like, what the heck does a person do to earn a PhD in piano studies??? I'll bet she didn't spend 8-10 hours per day in the lab like I did!I disagree.
I think you misunderstood me. I didn't say that getting a PhD in music would be no more difficult or complicated than writing a few notes on a piece of music paper. What I said was that I bet anything that getting the PhD in music (actually, in piano) did not involve spending inordinate amounts of time in the lab, and that I don't know what the heck it involves. There really is nothing judgmental in that.
67
posted on
12/22/2011 11:52:14 AM PST
by
exDemMom
(Now that I've finally accepted that I'm living a bad hair life, I'm more at peace with the world.)
To: exDemMom
I think you misunderstood me. I didn't say that getting a PhD in music would be no more difficult or complicated than writing a few notes on a piece of music paper. What I said was that I bet anything that getting the PhD in music (actually, in piano) did not involve spending inordinate amounts of time in the lab, and that I don't know what the heck it involves. There really is nothing judgmental in that. I bet she spent inordinate amounts of time in front of a piano. Now, having said that, I think getting a PhD in a subject that requires field studies, control groups, massive amounts of data compiling as well as interpreting is probably a lot (a big lot) different than getting a PhD in Piano studies.
For the record, I don't think you said anything judgmental either way. Those of us on the engineering track didn't have a whole lot of respect for liberal arts majors but with the benefit of hindsight, I think it's actually a hard degree to get (English that is, not social studies of whatever weepy subject the faculty thought up). In fact, I thought of minoring in English if there even is such a thing but I was already swamped with music, engineering and electronics. Final note, although my title is an Engineer, I don't have the degree to support it although I could teach your kids music.
68
posted on
12/22/2011 12:27:05 PM PST
by
Lx
(Do you like it, do you like it. Scott? I call it Mr. and Mrs. Tennerman chili.)
To: muawiyah; exDemMom
Your personal experience has nothing whatsoever to do with Italian universities then or now. Then neither do yours from post 60 yet you don't even see the dichotomy.
I love the snooty, dare I say pretentious language about how students that didn't take fifty languages have nothing on you.
Did you, sometime in the past, have your Corpus callosum severed? You appear to suffer from a split brain, among myriad other issues...
I find it amazing how you are an expert on every subject there is, impressive and you learned it while you sorted mail for forty years. You really ought to thank Google and Wiki.
69
posted on
12/22/2011 12:47:16 PM PST
by
Lx
(Do you like it, do you like it. Scott? I call it Mr. and Mrs. Tennerman chili.)
To: Lx
I suppose I might have sorted some mail but my secretaries would have needed to open it first.
70
posted on
12/22/2011 12:54:51 PM PST
by
muawiyah
To: Lx; exDemMom
Your typical physician starts out as a student in some department inside the College of Arts and Sciences. Maybe he studies chemistry ~ here’s the Indiana University statement on the issue ~ rather informative: http://hpplc.indiana.edu/medicine/med-prep.shtml
71
posted on
12/22/2011 12:59:13 PM PST
by
muawiyah
To: muawiyah
Really, not only did you have a secretary, you had,
secretaries
My apologies to the Forum admins if I have violated a copyright. Please delete if so.
72
posted on
12/22/2011 1:03:41 PM PST
by
Lx
(Do you like it, do you like it. Scott? I call it Mr. and Mrs. Tennerman chili.)
To: muawiyah; exDemMom
Believe it or not, I do have an idea how the edumacation system works.
73
posted on
12/22/2011 1:05:06 PM PST
by
Lx
(Do you like it, do you like it. Scott? I call it Mr. and Mrs. Tennerman chili.)
To: Lx
LX, you poor brain damaged idiot ~ I have a free subscription from SCIENCE for submitting "corrections" ~ and I'll guarantee you that didn't need access to Wiki or Google.
Ever read a book?
74
posted on
12/22/2011 1:14:35 PM PST
by
muawiyah
To: Wonder Warthog
Once again, you are trying way too hard to defend Rossi's academic credentials (or lack thereof).
Just because, in Italy, someone with a Master's degree awarded prior to the institution of a doctoral degree within the Italian university system in the mid-1980s was allowed to use the title "Dr." in Italy (and only in Italy, it said that in Wiki), does not make their degree a doctorate. The Magistrale or Laurea degree required 5 years of university, total--which simply is not PhD level work.
As for what real Italians have to say on the meaning of "Dottore Magistrale in Filosofia", two Italians posted in this thread, the last two responses.
Penultimate response:
It's a Master degree.
I'm italian.
Ultimate response:
Yup, a Master. In philosphy, it required an "experimental" thesis, that is an original work, but not of the quality required for a PhD. In Italy, one is called "Dottore" with that degree. Indeed, it used to be the highest degree until 1986, if I remember correctly the year.
I'm surprised you haven't even addressed my other critique of the letter supposedly verifying Rossi's academic credentials, which is that it appears doctored (font sizes change for no reason; there are extra spaces between words in a non-right justified document; the date formats are inconsistent).
Last, I'll say that it must have been nice getting a PhD back in the 70s, when you apparently had lots of time to take classes in non-related subjects. Even had my program allowed for it, I simply did not have the luxury to take non-science classes.
75
posted on
12/22/2011 1:17:45 PM PST
by
exDemMom
(Now that I've finally accepted that I'm living a bad hair life, I'm more at peace with the world.)
To: muawiyah
LX, you poor brain damaged idiot Gee, that's like getting a poison pen letter from Manson.
Considering all the signs you exhibit, you might want to, in you more lucid states, mosey on down to the local Psychologist. While they have meds that can fix brain impairment, you have to take them as soon as you notice a problem. They may stop further degradation, but you won't get back what you've lost.
Think of me as you sort mail.
76
posted on
12/22/2011 2:03:30 PM PST
by
Lx
(Do you like it, do you like it. Scott? I call it Mr. and Mrs. Tennerman chili.)
To: exDemMom
I'm surprised you haven't even addressed my other critique of the letter supposedly verifying Rossi's academic credentials, which is that it appears doctored (font sizes change for no reason; there are extra spaces between words in a non-right justified document; the date formats are inconsistent). Are you sure it's not Obama's birth certificate? /s
77
posted on
12/22/2011 2:05:03 PM PST
by
Lx
(Do you like it, do you like it. Scott? I call it Mr. and Mrs. Tennerman chili.)
To: Lx
You are pretty obviously totally delusional. I think a good trepanning would help you out a lot. There’s a lot of rage and pressure in there that needs venting ~
78
posted on
12/22/2011 2:25:10 PM PST
by
muawiyah
To: exDemMom
"Just because, in Italy, someone with a Master's degree awarded prior to the institution of a doctoral degree within the Italian university system in the mid-1980s was allowed to use the title "Dr." in Italy (and only in Italy, it said that in Wiki), does not make their degree a doctorate. The Magistrale or Laurea degree required 5 years of university, total--which simply is not PhD level work. Look, dunce. I never said it was "PhD Level work". Just that he was entitled to use the title "Dr". I suspect that if a Brit moved to the US, and had a KCBE (Knight Commander of the British Empire) honorial, that he would still append that title to his correspondence.
"Yup, a Master. In philosphy, it required an "experimental" thesis, that is an original work, but not of the quality required for a PhD. In Italy, one is called "Dottore" with that degree. Indeed, it used to be the highest degree until 1986, if I remember correctly the year.
Which I already knew, and said so.
"I'm surprised you haven't even addressed my other critique of the letter supposedly verifying Rossi's academic credentials, which is that it appears doctored (font sizes change for no reason; there are extra spaces between words in a non-right justified document; the date formats are inconsistent).
Why should I bother? There is plenty of verification that Rossi has a legitimate degree from U. of Milan. Lewans, Krivit, and others have verified it. There is some confusion among them as to whether the degree is "laurea" or "dottore", which makes me think this whole "mountain from molehill" has a lot more to do with errors in translation than with any nefariousness.
"Last, I'll say that it must have been nice getting a PhD back in the 70s, when you apparently had lots of time to take classes in non-related subjects. Even had my program allowed for it, I simply did not have the luxury to take non-science classes.
LOL. I was referring to my undergraduate tenure. You say you spent "8-10" hours a day in the lab. By my standards, you were a slacker. I spent WAY more time than that "at the bench". 'Twas useful, too, as I got through my doctorate in three years.
To: muawiyah
I already did that in honor of the Christmas season. Now I have a festive candle sticking out of my head. It’s a great conversation piece.
80
posted on
12/22/2011 4:35:48 PM PST
by
Lx
(Do you like it, do you like it. Scott? I call it Mr. and Mrs. Tennerman chili.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-82 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
The main point of interest here is the steadily increasing amount of data corroborating the LENR phenomena. Like most people I have been ignoring this matter since 1989, because some the top Physics professionals said it was bunk I put it on the back burner as wishful thinking. Then in 2009 I see the 60 minutes piece, that was real eye opener, when Rob Duncan vice chancellor of a Missouri Physics institution looked at current LENR work, he had an awakening and became an advocate of LENR research, that was interesting. Since then I have been waiting for possible confirmation from the larger experimental, physics community, and here we are approaching 2012 with this type of information trickling in from widespread, reliable sources and credibility is gaining steadily. Of course, we are not there yet, but LENR is gaining momentum as a viable energy solution, the final outcome is yet to be reached, but if Andrea Rossi actually sells functioning units to legitimate end users and they work as advertised, it’s game over for the entire Energy sector and humankind enters a new era.
200 percent? That is COP 2 right? I thougt we passed that level long time ago….
That is a good point Burt. The 200% is what I read but it may be a Google translation error or wrongly stated. However, Passerini’s article does state that Celani’s work is in it’s infancy so those numbers would be consistent with that. Although not impressive in and of itself, it does provide evidence of more people successfully working on this outside of the names commonly bantered about. It was Celani who so “kindly” offered to evaluate the e-Cat independently and who brought a spectrometer to January 14 test, which angered Rossi when he found out.