I’ll give you the fact that we gave material support to the allies, but our entry into WWI didn’t effect the outcome one way or the other. If you are saying we should have stayed neutral and allowed the Germans to take over Europe we’ll just have to agree to disagree.
BTW, the French are responsible for the onerous Treaty of Versailles, not Wilson.
Also, didn’t you mean to say the JEWS are at fault for all the trouble in the ME?
The French only imposed Versailles using an American made shotgun that Wilson loaded and handed Clemenceau. I am indifferent to who would have won World War I without American participation, the Germans were no worse than the French, and probably more philosemitic in the bargin.
Even with the aid of the Americans, the British and French did not “take over” Germany or Austro-Hungary, they were content to steal their colonies for one more generation and demand tribute, under the guise of “reparations.”
To say that American support for the Allies during the Great War did not materially effect the outcome is to ignore facts.
I do not mean to say that the Jews are responsible for trouble in the Middle East. The presence of the Jews gives Middle Eastern dictators like Sadam and Nassar a convenient distraction to divert their subjects wrath at an external target. Islamism is the reaction of those unable to adapt to modernity, and Jews are, out of necessity, the most adaptable and modernizing people in human history. Without Jews, the dictators would find some other diversion, like the Iraq-Iran War which killed a million (and as Kissinger observed, it was a shame they couldn’t both lose.)