Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

HOLLYWOOD breaking the internet while Congress steals our liberty
EFF + Vanity ^ | 11-7-2011 | Corynne McSherry

Posted on 12/14/2011 5:34:55 PM PST by apoliticalone

November 7, 2011 | By Trevor Timm The Stop Online Piracy Act: A Blacklist by Any Other Name Is Still a Blacklist

During the past week, momentum against the House’s draconian copyright bill has gained steam, as venture capitalists, Internet giants and major artists have denounced it for handing corporations unprecedented power to censor countless websites and stifle free speech. In response, the bill’s big-pocketed supporters have gone on the offensive, attempting to mislead the public about the bill’s true reach. In a particularly egregious example, the Chamber of Commerce posted an attack on its website insisting that the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) is not a “blacklist bill."

(Excerpt) Read more at eff.org ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Computers/Internet; Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: congress; freespeech; internet; liberty
I rarely post new threads, not because there are not things I'd like to say, but because I'm not bright enough to offer a post that doesn't obviously push a political agenda. The Parties mean nothing to me.

My take is if Congress never passed another law or regulation we'd be better off, but here we have Rep Lamar Smith (R) from Texas trying to muzzle us for the benefit of Hollywood.

Hollywood offers only propaganda yet they are protected by our government and all of the enforcement actions are paid by taxpayers. The favoritism and bias is an outrage when you consider that every US citizen can have their identity stolen and no one in law enforcement or Justice Department gives a hoot. It's only thievery of worthless Hollywood trash that they worry about because Hollywood owns them. The lawmakers such as Rep Lamar Smith are obviously owned and not by us citizens.

As a side line my medical records were recently carelessly discarded from a non-business related physician's office and I'm told in a letter it is now my problem. Business should be held accountable for their actions with our personal information. Instead Congress makes we the people accountable to Hollywood.

1 posted on 12/14/2011 5:35:01 PM PST by apoliticalone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: apoliticalone
If this happened they are in violation of the HIPAA act.

If they even have access to medical records they are bound by HIPAA.

Get a lawyer, sue the hell out of them.

2 posted on 12/14/2011 5:41:08 PM PST by unixfox (Abolish Slavery, Repeal The 16th Amendment!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: apoliticalone

OTOH, non-existent medical records means that less about your health is known to the government.

Years ago, during a routine appointment, my doc came out of his office with this thin little file (I have been a patient for 38 years and he _knows_ my hx), saying “what happened?” There were no records in there except another routine appointment about a year earlier.

I tend to avoid the docs, if at all possible and since the advent of zer0care, I keep wondering if that might not be the best approach. Do they need to know about a surgery I had in 1981? The cracked metatarsal in 1997? The gastric ulcer that was treated and never recurred? My childbirth records are in another city somewhere, under a different married name. The OB is long retired, if he is even still alive. My childhood pediatrician is long dead and all that was under my maiden name in another state, pre-computers. I have no serious or chronic problems, so far. IMO, my privacy is more assured and if I need to see a new MD, I can tell them any pertinent medical history. In fact, that was just how it used to be, way back in the day.


3 posted on 12/14/2011 6:46:01 PM PST by reformedliberal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: unixfox

Thanks for the reply. My secondary point was that when we individuals have our information stolen or lost by another, it is up to us to file a suit or pay for credit watch services, but when the Hollywood elite fail to control their frivolous entertainment data (and imo that’s all it is) it is made into a criminal act and the prosecution is done on taxpayer dime.

But the really important issue is the inevitable censorship against internet sites such as FR by competing corporate interests. The big news media wants to control the message and they will do what is necessary to shutdown user sites and opinions and it will be up to those that are censored to defend themselves. They’ve already regularly abuse their take down rights on YouTube.


4 posted on 12/15/2011 7:03:30 AM PST by apoliticalone (Honest govt. that operates in the interest of US sovereignty and the people, not global $$$)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: reformedliberal

Aside from the fact that this SOPA or Leahy’s Protect IP (Senate Version) bill is about giving Eric Holder the ability to attack any individual or group at the beck and call of Hollywood, I agree totally with you on less is better.

Even my own physician says that the mechanization of health records is about corporate and government control over our lives. Every American will eventually have a database that covers every aspect of our existence from political opinions, are we political activist, to our health, and our wealth.

Technology as had positives but the data base aspect has not been good for liberty and freedom. Bills such as SOPA serve as more notches against us to the benefit of those who can put the dogs on us at whim.


5 posted on 12/15/2011 9:43:21 AM PST by apoliticalone (Honest govt. that operates in the interest of US sovereignty and the people, not global $$$)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: apoliticalone
here we have Rep Lamar Smith (RINO) from Texas trying to muzzle us for the benefit of Hollywood

(affiliation corrected --Ed)

Why do supposed Republicans go out of their way to punish their friends and reward their enemies? Why does the party leadership tolerate it?

6 posted on 12/16/2011 6:45:29 AM PST by Burkean Buckleyite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: apoliticalone
But the really important issue is the inevitable censorship against internet sites such as FR by competing corporate interests. The big news media wants to control the message and they will do what is necessary to shutdown user sites and opinions and it will be up to those that are censored to defend themselves. They’ve already regularly abuse their take down rights on YouTube.

The Beltway insiders (and the Republican Party is no less guilty than the Democratic Party) fear the voice of the people. Hence their efforts to hobble the Internet on whatever convenient pretext presents itself.

7 posted on 12/16/2011 6:45:52 AM PST by Burkean Buckleyite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson