Posted on 12/11/2011 1:58:53 PM PST by ProgressingAmerica
In "How we advertised America", George Creel wrote the following: (Page 16/17)
As a matter of fact, I was strongly opposed to the censorship bill, and delayed acceptance of office until the President had considered approvingly the written statement of my views on the subject. It was not that I denied the need of some sort of censorship, but deep in my heart was the feeling that the desired results could be obtained without paying the price that a formal law would have demanded. Aside from the physical difficulties of enforcement, the enormous cost, and the overwhelming irritation involved, I had the conviction that our hope must lie in the aroused patriotism of the newspaper men of America.With the nation in arms, the need was not so much to keep the press from doing the hurtful things as to get it to do the helpful things. It was not servants we wanted, but associates. Better far to have the desired compulsions proceed from within than to apply them from without.
As I read this, the first thing that came to mind was the journolist. But this is much more insidious. The journolist was just a bunch of conniving leftists posing as journalists getting together in a proverbial 'smoke filled room' to influence an election. What Creel and the boys did was apply pressure from the government. But they're not in favor of nationalization! Not censorship! No. What they want to do is make progress. Abuse the regulatory state perhaps, apply a little pressure where they can. You know, nudge. Nudge them into making "the right decisions" about what they'll report on. Creel continued:
Aside from these considerations, there was the freedom of the press to bear in mind. No other right guaranteed by democracy has been more abused, but even these abuses are preferable to the deadening evil of autocratic control.
Yet if they're going to make "associates" out of the press, then there is no freedom of the press to speak of. It's a lie. It only looks free on the surface. Having the press turn itself into a willing branch of autocracy, now wouldn't that be perfect? And worth note is how this was originally geared just to be strictly about protecting military prospects, actions and so forth. But that's the thing about statists and authoritarians. They can't help themselves but go further. The only way people can be free is if the government is limited. More from Creel: (Page 18)
My proposition, in lieu of the proposed law, was a voluntary agreement that would make every paper in the land its own censor, putting it up to the patriotism and common sense of the individual editor to protect purely military information of tangible value to the enemy. The plan was approved and, without further thought of the pending bill, we proceeded to prepare a statement to the press of America that would make clear the necessities of the war-machine even while removing doubts and distrusts.
And with that, the shadow press was born. They ceased to be a free press(while still looking like one on the surface) and became associates of the state. Wilson and Creel didn't nationalize the press, they just made progress. In what year did you think journalism died? This book is dated 1920, but the CPI was born in 1917.
In his later years, he became a Cold Warrior and warned against Soviet expansionism in Russia's Race for Asia (New York: Bobbs-Merrill, 1949).
More accurately: exposing them as Pravda and Tass scumrats.
My local paper just dumped a long time local conservative columnist and replaced him with a syndicated Van Jones column.
Guys like George Creel and Edward Bernays didn’t always do bad things but were true progressives and its important to realize that they were manipulators and learn the methods they used.
If it weren’t for Bernays, we may not even be eating bacon but he was a master manipulator who wrote the book (Crystallizing public opinion) that Joseph Goebbels used as the model for his propaganda.
These guys would be on par with Cass Sunstein.
Please add me to your ping list
“Gentlemen of the Fourth Estate, I call you here today to tell you that your reign is over.” John F. Kerry, 2004, after the Dem convention. I saw that clip and wondered what he meant. Every newsperson there laughed.
Kerry is a more ‘nuanced’ Weiner. He’s a water-carrying traitor through and through.
“John Kerry: Media Has “Responsibility” To “Not Give Equal Time” To Tea Party”
8/5/2011
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2011/08/05/john_kerry_media_has_responsibility_to_not_give_equal_time_to_tea_party.html
How many remember the old Radio Albania on shortwave?
Every paragraph included the term “Marxist-Leninist”.
From what I hear, CNN and PMSNBC are getting pretty much like Radio Albania, but fortunately my new Gsat does not carry them, but it does have FOX News.
I see that a number of FReepers do not like FOX any more then CNN, and the little neo-Marxist in the USSA call FOX, “FAUX News”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.