[gargoyle]

...I got an answer, you think the military and the spirit of the corps is moral? The military are hired to do one thing does one thing well, kill the enemy when called on to do so. If you're qualified to do that, who cares what your sexual preference is! I would agree that DADT should have stood instead of being repealed.

[little jeremiah]

Attacking the enemy in wartime is moral.

The “who cares what your sexual preference is” is nonsense because the men and women in uniform are now stuck with very close association with homosexuals even though the majority of those serving did NOT want to, thanks to Ron Paul and eveyrone else who voted to allow mentally ill sex perverts in the military!

[Jim Robinson]

If you’re going to push homosexuals in the military, go elsewhere to do it. It’s not appreciated and not wanted here. Continue doing so and we will part company.

[manc]

I care because we live in close quarters, we have to share sleeping bags in Arctic and mountain survival training, we share showers.

I and I know of not one pals who I served with or is still serving who wants homosexuals in the military though I did serve in a combat unit on a cook or a desk jockey thousands of miles away form a war zone

[cracker45]

“...I got an answer, you think the military and the spirit of the corps is moral? The military are hired to do one thing does one thing well, kill the enemy when called on to do so. If you’re qualified to do that, who cares what your sexual preference is! I would agree that DADT should have stood instead of being repealed.”

You sound like a mafia hitman, amoral and stupid!

JC