Viking Kitty Facepalm!
Posted on 12/06/2011 9:24:46 AM PST by Absolutely Nobama
There are many reasons to think Ron Paul is a bottom feeder. He refuses to support a Constitutional amendment to protect normal, heterosexual marriage. He voted to turn the United States military into a San Francisco bath house by repealing DADT. He wants to see drugs and prostitution legalized. He thinks Islamo-Nazi Iran should have a nuclear weapon. He surrounds himself with lunatics like Cindy Sheehan's love slave, Screwy Lewy Rockwell. In general, there isn't a sewer RuPaul (H/T: Mark Levin) isn't too proud to hunt for food in.
Then, there's this. From CBS News:
***********************************
"Libertarian Congressman Ron Paul is breaking with many of his fellow Republicans - among them his son Rand - to support the creation of the planned Islamic cultural center near the former site of the World Trade Center that has come to be known as the 'ground zero mosque.'
In a statement decrying 'demagogy' around the issue, the former Republican presidential candidate wrote late last week that "the debate should have provided the conservative defenders of property rights with a perfect example of how the right to own property also protects the 1st Amendment rights of assembly and religion by supporting the building of the mosque.'
'Instead, we hear lip service given to the property rights position while demanding that the need to be 'sensitive' requires an all-out assault on the building of a mosque, several blocks from 'ground zero,' Paul continues.
He goes on to argue that 'the neo-conservatives' who demand continual war in the Middle East and Central Asia...never miss a chance to use hatred toward Muslims to rally support for the ill conceived preventative wars."
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-20014453-503544.html
************************************
Yes, I know this is old news. No, I'm not breaking any new ground here. However, since Ol' Ru is running for President, this crap should be revisited. (Even Howard "YEAAAAAAAAH!" Dean thought this was a bad idea.)
I don't want to get involved in the technical legalities about whether or not this House of Hatred should or should not be built, since the developers don't seem to have the money for Lincoln Logs, let alone building a gazillion dollar insult. That was beaten to death last year and I don't feel like rehashing it. What I want to focus on is RuPaul's detestable attitude on the matter. (Which is eerirly similiar to Chariman Obama's and Nazi Pelosi's detestable attitude on the matter.)
The above snippet shows, once again, that RuPaul is NOT a Conservative, regardless of what his drug addict followers claim. He's basically an anarchist, and this little episode proves it.
Now, before we get started, I think it's appropriate to explain what I mean by anarchist. I'm not talking in this sense of a bomb-thowing V For Vendetta type. I'm talking about someone who believes they have the right to do what they please when they feel like doing it. That's what RuPaul is advocating here. This has nothing to do with "neo-conservative" war mongering or the religious rights of Muslims. (This is a bare-bones explanation of RuPaul's mentor Murray Rothbard's anarcho-capitalism, which basically states that society should allow individuals to do as they please as long as they can afford to do so.)
A Conservative doesn't believe in any of the above nonsense. A Conservative is a staunch defender of the individual and his rights, but the Conservative also believes in common sense and morality. For example, a Conservative would defend a bar owner's right to allow smoking in his bar, but a Conservative would fight tooth and nail to stop a strip club from opening next to an elementary school or a church. The Conservative fights for limited government, but never for anarchy. The Conservative also believes that while the individual has rights and those rights should be defended at all costs, the individual should use those rights in a responsible manner. In other words, the Conserative may very well want to give the social finger to the driver of a Smart Car with a "Obama 2012" bumper sticker, but he doesn't because he believes in a polite moral society.
Ladies and gentlemen, yes there's a fine line that often gets blurred when it comes to our rights, and I don't claim to have all the answers. But I will tell you this, I sure do understand our rights better than Ron Paul does.
Viking Kitty Facepalm!
Well, you saw post 44 and the smarmy twerp that posted it, right?
Many of those who push the homo agenda have some personal stake in it somewhere somehow.
And they will point the finger at people who question them.
We’ve seen it before.
OWK comes to mind.
Boy was he a fruit basket.
He was always “blowing the clarion for everything homosexual”.
If it was a butt bandit thread, you could count on OWK to be there sliming everyone he came in contact with.
He finally bought it, but it took forever.
Now, if the homo pushers would just get the hint that this is a conservative site and there is nothing conservative about such “wholesome” activities as the Folsom Street Fair and the toddler fetish gear they showcase... jd777 I DARE you to google search Folsom Street Fair with safe search off.
You’ll see how wholesome and conservative they are.
You can get away with the "queer" label with some Mods but not others. So be careful.
Well bye Tard. . . .And it’s PaulTard yuh fricking moron.
How people like you make it this far in life without drowning in the shower is beyond my comprehension.
Well bye Tard. . . .And it’s PaulTard yuh fricking moron.
How people like you make it this far in life without drowning in the shower is beyond my comprehension.
He wuz probably confused and thought Jim Thompson Wuz the Boss. LOL
He wuz probably confused and thought Jim Thompson Wuz the Boss. LOL
Will do.
:)
Will do.
:)
Welcome aboard, patriot!
Ouch, didn’t know that.. thank you for the warning :D
Will do!
It’s strange.. but sometimes I get images of jameses777 (zotted a few months ago) when I read this guy’s posts... hmm.. wonder where I got THAT idea.. o.O
the date doesn’t seem to match up.. but we know how that works out sometimes ;)
BTW there are two, the Homosexual Agenda and the Moral Absolutes lists. Sometimes it’s a two-fer.
I hear that’s a stupid move.
LOL!
I’m not even bothering to respond. If one has to ask that question, they have no business coming here in the first place.
Holy carp, that’s gonna leave a mark!
You’re welcome. Don’t want any time outs or warnings. :-)
I support killing terrorists but not nation building, and I oppose bailouts and all forms of subsidies.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.