Posted on 12/05/2011 10:42:05 AM PST by Slyscribe
don’t take any of my money for anything, I want drugs, get mellow and who cares what I have sex with.
That is the basic views for them and then they want their man running on our ticket, why on earth do we allow them too.
The libs would not want them on their ticket due to their tax issue but we tolerate them and then have them on our stage.
The fireman around the corner from me who I might add I don’t like is one of them.
he forgets our tax money pays his wages but he does not want to pay tax for anything, trust me even with his own daughter who is a brat and yea I told him that one night he thinks she should raise herself, she is my daughters age aged 10.
I’ll tell you more about him tomorrow when I have more time.
Hope all is well with you and hubby.
I had expected as much. Interesting to discover it is true.
Thanks Jim for revealing that bit of info.
I really don’t care who the RJC invites and doesn’t invite to a PRIVATE function. I’m not a member of the RJC nor do I have any plans to join the RJC. In fact, I had no idea they even existed until I came across this article.
I’m just glad they stood up to RuPaul and his legions of antisemites, 9/11 Truthers, druggies, and Occupy Wall Street piles of trash. I wish the other debates kept him out, too. He’s a not a Republican. He’s not a Conservative. All he is just another boring populist. We need serious candidates, not more hot air.
Roger that!
You completely contradicted yourself in that post. But don’t sweat it, #103 peals away the inconsistent BS in regards to this organization quite well.
Thanks!
I call them the ultra kook anarchy fringe of the left.
They’re the red headed step children of politics.
WrongPaul zot happy dance...ensues.
D-Back: So I've been here since 2000, posting and commenting mostly on Catholic issues, guns, and various NY/NJ events, and it has all been a mere FRONT to advance my true agenda as a. . . Leftist?
Really, is that your take on my comments?
And what is so unconservative about contrasting Ron Paul--warts and all--with the current pack of potential candidates--Mitt Romney, Newt Gingrich, and Rick Perry? Are those three so demonstrably conservative that a thinking person is not permitted to contemplate the libertarian alternative, and discuss the same on FR with conservative brethren and sistren?
How will the Great Leader respond, with a thoughtful, clarifying post or a simple ZOT?
If ZOT, then I regret that I have but one Pseudonymous Internet Name to give for freedom, liberty and conservative principles.
And I will never apologize for believing that America should put America's interests first.
Just posted a notice on a different thread to flaming paultard spam monkeys. And it applies to you too:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/2816719/posts?page=43#43
And if you or Ron Paul have problems with me exercising my liberty and my God-given unalienable rights to defend my freedom of speech and my freedom of association and all my other freedoms on my own personal private property, then you and he can KMA on the way out the door!! Apparently you have no concept regarding the true nature of God or Liberty!
Free Republic is open to all like-minded God & country, life & liberty conservatives. Paultards (and others) who push gay rights or refuse to defend America and our allies (like Israel) are NOT like-minded God & country, life & liberty conservatives and are welcome to exercise their free speech rights ELSEWHERE!!
Flaming paultard spam monkeys don’t like it? Too bad. The feeling is mutual.
Thank you very much.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.