The 14th Amendment DID NOT repeal article II. It naturalized all the Slaves and their Children. Wong Kim Ark went WAY beyond the intentions of the Congress and the State Legislators who voted for it, (Those in the South were COERCED into voting for it.) and is therefore bad law.
Either than or they’re pretend experts who only started telling the rules that way after they saw that Barack Obama was winning.
And AGAIN you repeat that lie. You keep overlooking the fact that the focus was on the birth certificate first because if you can't meet 14th Amendment citizenship requirements, then you CERTAINLY can't meet the requirements for President as most people erroneously understand them. If he couldn't prove he was born here, there was no need to go any further, and given his extreme reluctance to release any information about his birth (in the initial release, even his birth certificate number was blacked out.) people were rightly concerned about his attempts at fraud.
But you know this, and I think you won't acknowledge the truth so long as it conflicts with your narrative.
Do you think Barack Obama is a loyal American?
DiogenesLamp wrote: “Wong Kim Ark went WAY beyond the intentions of the Congress and the State Legislators who voted for it, (Those in the South were COERCED into voting for it.) and is therefore bad law.”
I’ve not been trying to talk you out of your opinion on that. I love that in our nation you have the right to pass judgement on U.S. Supreme Court precedents. My point is that your jurisdiction is the inside of your own head.
DiogenesLamp wrote: “We’ve covered this already. Your ‘judge’ is a Clinton Appointee and an idiot”
Yes, “We’ve covered this already.” I don’t suggest that you have to like the decisions. I point out how your theories fare before *real* judges, on the benches of a *real* courts.