DiogenesLamp wrote: “Wong Kim Ark went WAY beyond the intentions of the Congress and the State Legislators who voted for it, (Those in the South were COERCED into voting for it.) and is therefore bad law.”
I’ve not been trying to talk you out of your opinion on that. I love that in our nation you have the right to pass judgement on U.S. Supreme Court precedents. My point is that your jurisdiction is the inside of your own head.
DiogenesLamp wrote: “We’ve covered this already. Your ‘judge’ is a Clinton Appointee and an idiot”
Yes, “We’ve covered this already.” I don’t suggest that you have to like the decisions. I point out how your theories fare before *real* judges, on the benches of a *real* courts.
Your argument is "They are powerful, therefore You are wrong." A more basic form of your argument is "might makes right." Yes, the courts have the power of the gun to back them up, but that does not make them correct in their proclamations. You seem to have difficulty comprehending the distinction between being right and having power. It is Galileo v the Pope all over again.
If you had intellectual capacity, you could explain how the court decisions are correct BEYOND the fact that they can get armed men to enforce their decrees. (A newer version of trial by combat.)
Yes, “We’ve covered this already.” I don’t suggest that you have to like the decisions. I point out how your theories fare before *real* judges, on the benches of a *real* courts.
As well as Jewish victims protesting the loss of their property rights in the Volksgerichtshof. You do not comprehend the point. I am arguing that the courts in power are CORRUPT.
They do not administer law, they administer illegitimate liberal opinion with the trappings and power of law. This is a pretty common belief among conservatives regarding our Judicial system. It is strange that you do not share it. Have you ever criticized Roe v Wade, or Kelo?