The Cain Lynching (braying)

If you really keep the royal law found in Scripture, “LOVE your neighbor as yourself,” you are doing right. James 2:8

When Bill Clinton gave his famous finger wagging speech I decided to give him the benefit of the doubt. A commie lib friend of mine called and axed me what I thought and was defending him when I told him this is America and people are presumed innocent until proven guilty. The only argument we had was that if he would go on TV and lie to the American people then he should resign since that seemed unimaginable at the time. Even though I knew all about BJ’s reputation, from Paula Jones and his escapades in Arkansas as well as the Arkansas mafia, until Lewinski pulled out the blue dress did I consider him guilty beyond a doubt. America should be consistent and allow Herman Cain the same presumption of innocence and the burden of proof should be on the accuser, which should be fairly easy.

Herman Cain is going against some very powerful forces on both sides of the aisle although these tactics have the fingerprints of George Soros and the DNC. The two supposed women from the Chicago based Restaurant Ass may not even be attached to Cain since they sound like the usual post Anita Hill get rich quick for being offended by a man, lawsuit. If they were suing their boss or coworker Cain would be named as the CEO since they are going after the deepest pockets so they sue him for making a climate of sexual harassment we don’t know. At any rate these two are hardly credible as they had a history of this type of lawsuit and they were connected to the Chicago DNC.

The Gloria Allrat client who had the unbelievable story with absolutely no proof is even flimsier than the other two women. The fact she is connected to Axlerat makes he even more of a likely setup and without any sort of proof or at least the hotel record where she got an upgraded room from Cain there is no chance of belief as well as never following up with evidence she was bothered at the time. These are the same exact tactics which were used against Sarah Palin and is why she is not running. Their tactics are to throw enough mud at the wall and see what will stick to either destroy you or poison the well so bad people won’t lower themselves to voting for you.

As for this latest 16 year affair this woman had should be simple to verify’ barring that; he must be given the presumption of innocence. Running for President is too big to presume guilt as that is what this tactic is based on. She should have a list of hotels they shacked up in and witnesses who saw them together at the times. She should be able to have lists of friends she had told or at least waiters and restaurant people who saw them together over this long expanse of time. How many people even have that long of an affair without their wives and families figuring it out and divorcing them?

She has a number of texts and phone calls, let’s see them. If they are sexual in nature than that would prove his guilt or were they something else? Was it as he said, she was a longtime friend who they helped out on occasion and she was stabbing him in the back? Were all of those calls and texts over the past month threats and blackmail since she was in a desperate situation and she saw this as a meal ticket to take care of her financial situation? Was she able to tap into the Soros slime machine and have her bills paid if she was willing to make baseless charges against Herman Cain? These questions need to be answered and make more sense than anything she is saying. The presumption of innocence is required to get to the truth before we lynch somebody.

If Herman Cain is guilty of the affair then he needs to quit the race right now, if he is not than he needs to be supported by all Americans. We have had enough of this politics of personal destruction where you take a good person like Justice Thomas or Sarah Palin and destroy them with fabricated charges so they will be dismissed as a cook or a nut. Herman Cain is going against those same forces and they all believe that the ends justify their means. They have no remorse that they destroy peoples’ lives since it furthers their communist agenda and these people pose a threat to that agenda. These forces will use people like these women and pay them to say whatever they want to destroy the candidate’s credibility so they can win an election. These are the same lies which were told about Palin and were never proven and always disproven over time but the damage had been done to the point of destroying her entire family. We are very likely seeing this again.

The presumption of innocence is the most basic of American rights. As Conservatives we need to support and protect that right with everything we have. It is who we are and what is required. When the other side will claim Palin was guilty of the Giffords shooting we need to hold strong and no longer be swayed by questionable charges and attacks. We need to keep our eye on the ball and realize there are unimaginable forces at work here and people like Herman Cain are a huge threat to those forces. He could cost those forces trillions and the destruction of entire communist agenda if he were to win the Presidency so he must be destroyed. Then after he is gone they will go after the next one with the same slimy tactics. Why? Because these Chicago tactics obviously work in this tabloid society and they own the tabloids.

It is time to make these tactics backfire and make them prove their charges. Until that point we are simply watching the lynching of another Conservative Black man by the same people who have been lynching Black Republicans for the past 150 years. If you go look into the history of the Klan you will find lynching was brought to the south by the Democrats who lost the war and began lynching as a tool to keep Blacks from voting. You will find that many of those lynched had just voted and the only Party that would take them was the Republican Party so the Klan lynched them as a warning to stop voting for the Republican Party. This is just another high tech lynching and the DNC going back to their racist roots. Let’s see the proof this woman has and until then Cain is to be believed 100%, she is simply being used as the rope for their only path to victory. A White woman sleeping with a Black man, how Jim Crow. Kinda looks like Democrat George Wallace and all his attack dogs standing in the doorway of the White House.

I am frustrated with Herman Cain's response to the accusations of these women, too little and too late. He needs to flay them open and expose them for the opportunists they obviously are. As for the machinery behind the practice of personal destruction of political candidates, a candidate just has to live with the knowledge that no one is immune and this has to be factored in when making a decision to run for any public office. Axelrod got Obama elected to the senate by clearing his way thru personal destruction of his competetors and thence on to the White House. The problem for me is not Cain's attackers, but the seeming reluctance he has to connect the dots leading to their common past association with the restraunt business. Cain needs to give his supporters some concrete information rebutting the charges. He is a fighter for sure and however it all turns out, he has shown a bravery and backbone that any of our candidates would do well to emulate.

>>> Nobody’s pouting so take that childish argument back to whatever website you normally post on. I seriously doubt you are a Newt supporter, my guess would be far more liberal than that.

C-Right sounds more like a cliche than a name so go disrupt another thread where people believe who you are. Tell your handlers you really got us. >>

Personal paranoid attacks: first refuge of the intellectually over matched and arrogantly ignorant - not to mention the reading comprehension challenged.

My apologies, I thought you were a plant and obviously you are not after looking at your page. This place has just been so flooded by them I simply thought with your 2010 signup and usual argument you were a plant.

As to your point, I find it easy to repeat the same talking points rather than critical thinking. What if he is innocent from being stabbed in the back by a friend? How do you handle that with the world watching and asking them to vote for you? It is a lose lose situation and they know it and maximize it to destroy people.

Are you a Newt supporter?

Pray for Cain

” - - - Sorry to say, but Group A is comprised almost entirely of females.”

Not so. On FOX last night Bill “The Spin Stops Here” O’Reilly on his “The Factor” show said in a very disgusted way “Cain is done.”

It is far easier to rush to judgement by being gullible, because only hearing is involved. Reasoned thought is a much more time-consuming effort.

BTW, if sound-bite journalism is the goal of the talking heads on TV, then who among them is NOT gullible?

You asked am I a Newt supporter?

Well, I focus on ideas and not people, and I come to these forums to discuss ideas mostly and not people per se.

However, there is an election coming up so I obviously have my pecking order like everyone else. It has changed a bit during this process too and might change again. As of today, here it is:

Newt, Cain and Perry are three that - for various reasons - I could support with some level of happiness (and some level of concern).

MB and Santorum are candidates I agree with ideologically but who I think are awful at leadership and whose behavior towards the other Republicans make me think they don’t get it — and by it — I mean they don’t understand that this is about who attacks Obama best, not about who attacks each other.

Huntsman and Paul are my two least favorites - for different reasons too. I really hope we are not left with Romney for the nomination, but I will vote for any of the 8 over Obama.

And I do that because the idea that drives me now is that another four years of Obama will end America, and a Republican congress with any of the 8 will not destroy us. As long as we have a breath, we can at some point turn it around.

Some of the 8 will merely slow down the decline, and some might actually turn it around. But either is preferable to certain death (Obama win).

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.