OK, thats pretty close to what I would say. OTOH do you really believe thats how the pols in DC will define it? In my view it isn;t a given. They’ll define it however they please to suit their agenda de jour. Remember if they get their way then its their defn which prevails w/o any further review. How are you seeing this as not a bad thing??
Don’t get me wrong: I don’t think it’s particularly necessary; however, whatever you think of McCain and Graham, they’re both veterans who are highly unlikely to have the motives being ascribed to them (eeevil manipulators who are intentionally inserting a double-secret violation of constitutional rights).