Don’t get me wrong: I don’t think it’s particularly necessary; however, whatever you think of McCain and Graham, they’re both veterans who are highly unlikely to have the motives being ascribed to them (eeevil manipulators who are intentionally inserting a double-secret violation of constitutional rights).
I never mentioned any particular pol in my replies. None can be trusted and even if they were trustworthy today it doesn’t mean they will be tomorrow. So, lets stick to the facts. In my last reply I said ‘They’ll define it however they please to suit their agenda de jour. Remember if they get their way then its their defn which prevails w/o any further review. How are you seeing this as not a bad thing??’
Can you answer my question rationally? If so Id like to hear it.