Posted on 11/22/2011 11:36:25 AM PST by 92nina
The affirmation from the Super Committee today that they will not be producing a debt proposal comes as no surprise after repeated reports that Democrats refused to agree to a deal that did not include massive tax hikes. In September, ATR offered the below suggestions to find $1.5 trillion in savingssimple solutions that would have gone beyond the $1.2 trillion debated by the committee. Democrats instead torpedoed the opportunity to enact such commonsense reforms, arguing tax hikes can fix what it is a fundamental spending problem.
First, the Committee should enact a hard, nominal discretionary spending freeze at the FY2012 levels.
Savings: $971 billion.
Secondly, the following reforms offer multiple ways for the committee to find its way to $1.5 trillion in savings (calculated over ten years, unless otherwise noted):
(Excerpt) Read more at atr.org ...
Take this article and others I found to the fight to the Libs on their own turf; put the Left on the defensive at Digg and at Reddit and in Stumbleupon and Delicious
Nice try Mattie Corrao, but nothing you write mentions a cut in BASELINE spending.
BTW, the only real money spending cuts are what is cut on a 1 year clock. This 10 year clock is just 2X the old Commie 5 year Plan BS.
That is.....find just $2.2 billion in spending cuts. If they can find $2.2 billion and get it passed, they can keep their job. If not, they're fired.
Once every member of Congress votes in favor of each of the 535 spending cuts, in order to assure that they get to keep their own job, we will have $1.2 trillion in spending cuts.
Simple. (Patting self on back)
Lets take this one step further...wasn’t the task of the committee to identify 1.2 trillion in spending cuts? And therefore isn’t changing the focus from spending cuts to tax increases abdicating the purpose of the committee.
Now who gets blamed...
EXCELLENT observation! Way to expose the smokescreen of “revenue.”
You got a point there. And that would presume future Congresses added nothing.
Thanks for this thread. The author of the article was misled to think that what you and I consider a cut was really a cut. What the Debtocrats consider a cut to be is a “reduction in the rate of future spending.”
What you and I consider to be a cut is what the Debtocrats call “a year-to-year reduction in the baseline of spending.”
Hence, unless the baseline spending is reduced, the ol’ National Debt Clock will just keep on a’going, and a’going with bigger and bigger dollars for your grandchildren to pay off.
The Debtocrats know this, and do their best to provide heart-rending smokescreens of poverty, fat-cats, need, corporate jets, poor people, big bonuses, tax-the-rich, no-child-left-behind, revenue, fairness doctrine, etc, etc, etc.
BTW, I forgot to mention their most important smokescreen: THE BIPARTISAN CAVE -IN.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.