is not exactly true. They did get you to stop the insulting birdy nonsense, didn't they?
... but you are part right still.
They "do nothing" about that steaming pile of your paste-up job, opening comment. Not that I'm complaining about "moderators" around here...
I'd be willing to keep stepping over the front porch, opening comment, open latrine you keep insisting upon doing your business in (since the moderators around here are not in the business of correcting or refereeing shades of "logical fallacy", nor do they police personal insult, save on the religion forum, and that most usually, only at report of abuse) but I must point out that instead of continuing worrying about what the little birdies do-doo in the yard (and whining about the "birdies" being "accommodated") clean off the front porch first, quit loading it with stinking piles, from the get-go, if you want people to take your 'complaints' seriously.
People are quite free to come and squawk, "it's a fraud", no matter whether it irritates you to no end, or not.
My objections here were spurred by your own commission of "classic logical fallacy" in saying,
for reasons I've already mentioned. They are putting a bet down, but one carefully hedged. Their wager can not be pointed to as proof.
Nobody has said the Swiss were part of some conspiracy to defraud, either...so for you to attempt to add them, is fallacious on that point alone. You cannot use them to enlarge the platform from which you use as a footing to jeer at critics and skeptics.
Accusing me of having committed some sort of unidentified error, is just so much noise, an attempt to distract from having it pointed out that your opening monologue, though having some truth behind it, has become a strawman argument itself, due to how you stretch & distort the information. Things are not as simple, all down the list, as you try to put them.
The Swiss, and how you tried to use them in the same fashion, was fairly typical of such distortions, and was the last straw for me.
Don't expect to come out swinging, spoiling for confrontation, then expect some "moderator" come ride to your rescue, when people around here give your own beak a twist. You should know by now, that's not it works.
This could all be laughable enough, if not for the appearance that this all, this whole FR Ecat thread biz, has become something of a psychologically burdensome stone for you.
Kevmo: “...but do nothing about the guys who leave behind worthless defecation and tons of classic fallacies & personal attacks.”
7MM: is not exactly true. They did get you to stop the insulting birdy nonsense, didn’t they?
***You’re none too bright, are you? My point was that the mods are only hands off with the seagulls and you reinforce it by saying that they got me to stop chasing seagulls.
Nobody has said the Swiss were part of some conspiracy to defraud, either...so for you to attempt to add them, is fallacious on that point alone.
***Your moonboy seagull compadre says otherwise.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/2811976/posts?page=25#25