Posted on 11/05/2011 2:27:33 PM PDT by JOHN W K
What I find very alarming is our ``conservative`` radio talk show hosts are constantly referring to Herman Cain as a ``conservative``, as if there is an intentional motive by these hosts to convince listeners that Herman Cain is a ``conservative``, when in fact Herman`s 9-9-9 plan is comparable to government enforced central planning on a federal level. And let us not forget how that central planning thing worked out for the ``Union of Soviet Socialist Republics``!
QUESTION:
Why would Mark Levin and other “conservative” talk show hosts constantly call Herman Cain a “conservative” when the evidence of Herman’s political “conservatism” is his 9-9-9 proposal and includes “opportunity zones” which is a proposal for federal “central planning”, big government picking winners and losers; would be an outright assault upon our free market system; is a proposal which violates our founder’s intentions forbidding preferential regulations of commerce to be granted by Congress to any state; blatantly proposes unequal tax law; and obviously ignores that part of our Constitution which requires direct taxes to be apportioned and indirect taxes to be uniform throughout the United States?
Why does Mark Levin call Herman Cain a “conservative” when Herman Cain proposes a further trashing of our Constitution; would enlarge our federal government’s central planning ambitions and trash our free market system; and would have big government picking winners and losers just as Obama‘s administration has done with the Solyndra swindle and plundering of our federal treasury?
Tell us Mark Levin, what part of Federalist No. 45 do you not understand which summarizes our federal government’s constitutionally limited job as follows?
“The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State governments are numerous and indefinite. The former will be exercised principally on external objects, as war, peace, negotiation, and foreign commerce; with which last the power of taxation will, for the most part, be connected.
The powers reserved to the several States will extend to all the objects which, in the ordinary course of affairs, concern the lives, liberties, and properties of the people, and the internal order, improvement, and prosperity of the State.
Tell us Mark Levin, what part of the Tenth Amendment which was specifically adopted to give force and effect to Federalist No. 45 and guarantee “federalism“, our Constitution’s plan, do you not understand, when you dare to call Herman Cain a “conservative“?
JWK
Read my lips Herman Cain. No additional national sales tax on top of the socialist tax calculated from incomes which you support.
Do you often agree with hit and run trolls, Perry harpie?
“Checked back on his old posts, seems to have popped back in recently just to put the repeated bad-mouth on Cain.
Sounds like an agenda to me.”
He’s been posting hysterically all over the internet for years against the Fair Tax.
Must be an IRS employee, tax preparer, corrupt politician, corrupt lobbyist...
There are a lot of people who have a lot to lose from changing the status quo :)
This is satire, right?
Mark Levin a RINO? LMAO!!!!!! You MUST be kidding.
Aren’t you a sad case, bless your heart.
The thought of Mark in drag is kind of amusing though. Maybe in some elegant evening wear. LOL
The difference is that these are nationally consumed commodities that are produced in regional manufacturing sites. For example, refineries are scattered across the country (and the world) creating jobs in those localities, but the product is consumed country-wide (or world-wide).
Small businesses provides goods and services like local restaurants, dry cleaners, tailors, grocery stores, plumbers, electricians, painters, landscapers, repairmen, etc.
There is no reason for the federal government to tax the transactions of these local businesses.
-PJ
We know what those words mean coming from a Perrybot. We in the north are more plain spoken. I'd give you the Ohio translation, but I'd get the zot.
GET OFF THE INTERNET YA BIG DOPE!!!
Who the heck is John W K anyway. Who’s hazing whom here?
“Who the heck is John W K anyway. Who’s hazing whom here?”
I’m with you, clueless.
Why hold back. Get the zot. :)
‘Who the heck is John W K anyway. Who’s hazing whom here?”
What I was getting at is that ANYONE who calls Mark Levin a RINO is troll.
We can fight all we want about who the ‘real’ conservative candidate is for the nomination, but calling Levin a RINO is simply over the top.
Have you actually heard Mark speak to the above objections to Cain’s “opportunity zones’ ?
JWK
JWK
I LOVE the 9-9-9 tax proposal. I hope it goes through.
Get off the thread you big dope!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.