To: TigersEye; Fred Nerks
I think you're right, the 1st picture is probably late 1970 because of baby Maya.
-The 2nd picture is roughly 1972/3 because of roughly 2/3-year-old Maya.
-The 3rd picture looks like he is about one year older than the 1st photo, so maybe it was taken ~1971, not 1969? I know, it says 1969 in ink along the border, but that seems wrong
96 posted on
11/10/2011 7:19:08 PM PST by
Future Useless Eater
(Chicago politics = corrupted capitalism = takeover by COMMUNity-ISM)
To: Future Useless Eater
98 posted on
11/10/2011 7:42:01 PM PST by
Fred Nerks
(FAIR DINKUM!)
To: Future Useless Eater
Your sequencing sounds about right from the look of it.
100 posted on
11/10/2011 9:00:52 PM PST by
TigersEye
(Life is about choices. Your choices. Make good ones.)
To: Future Useless Eater
Look at his large front teeth in the 1969 pic. Those teeth are new. By the time the baby Maya pic is taken, his other teeth have caught up with the fronts ones. He also looks a bit more hefty in both the family pics. Dates aside, the age progression appears right.
102 posted on
11/11/2011 7:49:35 AM PST by
bgill
(The Obama administration is staging a coup. Wake up, America, before it's too late.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson