I have a really bad feeling about where all this is headed. I sure hope I am wrong.
Cain Accuser Wants to Tell Story [for a few hundred thousand bucks], Lawyer Says
Anita Hill, chapter 2.
Do we have a betting pool on how long until she hires Gloria Allred?
Don’t really care. Cain says the accusations were deemed baseless and that’s the end of it in my book.
I think it would be better to get her out now before the DNC fiction writers get to her.
if she received a monetary settlement, and accepted the settlement,
how?
She made the deal, took the settlement, story over.
Nobody knows who she is and it should stay that way.
If some woman felt uncomfortable near a strong black man, the man can't help it.
Drag her ass out. If she’s a ‘RAT, you can’t bet she has got a lot of skeletons just like every other useful idiot that the ‘RATS drag out.
So now Cain is the defendant on sex harassment after he pulled the race card on a fellow republican. That’s rich
Did she get the details for the contract for her book signed and is the ink dry ?
The woman who claims to be a victim and who releases the information about the claim in spite of a confidentiality agreement which she knowingly and voluntarily signed with the advice of legal counsel, now wants to tell the whole story and be relieved of her contractual responsibility because Herman Cain descibed a situation without using anyone’s name, now claims victim status because her side of the story cannot be told.
I think it is like a child who murders his parents and then claims he is entitled to mercy because he is an orphan.
They make vague and unsourced allegations (actually they have sources but will not tell the public), then they demand and immediate and very detailed response from Cain, though it was a dozen years ago, and then claim Cain is being unfair for not allowing her to speak about the claim, though he no longer works for that employer and has no authority to demand that they waive the right of confidentiality.
Will the “victim” allow Cain to speak on the record as well? It does not occur just because Cain releases the employee from the confidentiality agreement. She must also release it.
Will she give the money back?
If I were Cain I would tell her to pound sand and consult with legal counsel concerning her release of information up to this point.
They all want to promote the stereotype the those black men cannot control their sexuality...probably the alleged victim is a white woman.
How is it that the press gathers around her house? Who told the press it was her that was involved?
I notice they are not blaming Cain publicly. The silence on that score says it all in my book.
I don't think the agreement is between her and Cain but between her and the association. There is no reason why they should release her from it.
She can easily break the agreement, pay the penalties and then get the big money on TV shows. This will happen. But it will drag on to keep it at the forefrunt of the news for as long as possible. There will be “transparency” here as her name slips out, bits and pieces of info, until it is inevitable she will make the break.
All a Romney insider would have to do is (through this woman’s lawyer) promise the woman she will be reimbursed for all losses and legal costs, plus get an attractive bonus check on top.
Why is this lawyer on TV? Why is he talking about a client he represented over a decade ago regarding an agreement he has said he does not have in his hand? Why is this lawyer speaking on TV about a client who has not been identified?
Hmmm...
Media stuck in stupid bump.