Replies

You could look at this quote and say that it merely refers to "citizens" as opposed to "natural-born citizens," and many birthers do. But, the reference to "natural-born citizens" earlier in the case defines the children of two U.S. citizens as NBCs "as distinguished from aliens or foreigners," a construction that does not seem to allow for a third category of citizens-by-birth who are not natural-born citizens.

There are exactly two ways to be a citizen of the US:

(1) Be a citizen-by-birth (natural born citizen), wherein the circumstances of your birth convey citizenship automatically, or

(2) Be a naturalized citizen, where you have successfully gone through the legal naturalization process and been awarded citizenship papers.

I submit that a person who is not a "natural born citizen", nor gone through naturalization, is not a US citizen in any respect.

Your About page contains a nice summary of bits and pieces, a portion of which some of us have tucked away, thanks.

(1) Be a citizen-by-birth (natural born citizen)...

I am trying to get out the door and will get back to you later. But let me ask: Do you believe the founders would have allowed the 35 year old son of two parents newly arrived from England at the time of his birth to serve as the CinC?

If you do, please help me with this:

"no person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States at the time of the adoption of the Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President,"

Do you have a theory on why the founders allowed ordinary citizens to serve as president on the first day of the nation, but required presidents born after the first day of the nation to be natural born citizens?