Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: noinfringers2; Mr Rogers

When MR first started trolling on the eligibility threads, I checked one year of his previous comments. Really easy to do, since one year was only about 300 comments, I scanned them and found he posted on THREE topics ONLY:

Western trivia

Western movie trivia

Some kind of denominational discussions

That was it.

Until, all of a sudden, wowie zowie - copy/past BS like spam, on the eligibility threads. And with a stinky attitude. Now he’s claiming he posted about other topics. I might have even scanned a couple of years. With a slightly less than 3 comments per day average (at that time) it’s pretty easy to scan a couple of years.


45 posted on 10/24/2011 1:38:58 PM PDT by little jeremiah (We will have to go through hell to get out of hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]


To: little jeremiah; noinfringers2

little lies again.

I have never posted on western trivia. I have never posted on western movie trivia. I rarely post on anything involving movies. I have posted, sometimes at great length, on the religion forum. Most of my posts involve politics & the military.

And I post an average of 1,000 posts/year.

But again, honesty is not a birther trait. Honestly would force them to THINK about why no court & no state pays any attention to them. Honesty would force them to admit WorldNutDaily is possibly the worst possible source of legal information. Honesty would make them wonder at this quote from the DISSENT in WKA:

“Considering the circumstances surrounding the framing of the Constitution, I submit that it is unreasonable to conclude that “natural-born citizen” applied to everybody born within the geographical tract known as the United States, irrespective of circumstances, and that the children of foreigners, happening to be born to them while passing through the country, whether of royal parentage or not, or whether of the Mongolian, Malay or other race, were eligible to the Presidency, while children of our citizens, born abroad, were not.”

http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/historics/USSC_CR_0169_0649_ZD.html

Oops! Did I link to a US Supreme Court case, but not justia? Oh well. Guess I’m the only person in America who can find Supreme Court cases without relying on “justia”...

But honesty isn’t what birthers are about. Then they couldn’t call Rush Limbaugh a RINO. They couldn’t attack Sarah Palin as a GOP dupe.

If they were honest, they would honestly face the reason no court or state will give them the time of day: the meaning of NBC has been settled law since before 1900. And it was widely understood as applying to those born of alien parents from the beginning of the country.

If honest, they would admit that Natural Born Citizen was a legal term with an established legal meaning when the Constitution was written.

No, honesty is not what birthers do. Not at all.


52 posted on 10/24/2011 3:04:47 PM PDT by Mr Rogers ("they found themselves made strangers in their own country")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson