Posted on 10/21/2011 8:00:50 AM PDT by ZachJones
...New evidence conclusively establishes that 25 U.S. Supreme Court opinions were sabotaged then republished at Justia.com during the run up to the 08 election.... ...Since Justia placed affirmations on each tampered opinion which state Full Text of Case, personnel may also be guilty of violating 18 U.S.C. 1018 by intentionally passing off tampered versions of US Supreme Court opinions as if they were official versions published by the US Supreme Court....
Regardless of who you supported in 2008, or whether you agree with the assertion of Minors relevance, every American should be outraged that 25 Supreme Court cases were surgically sabotaged and then passed off to the public as if the tampered versions contained the Full Text of Case. This is the very definition of Orwellian fascism.... ....The reality that both candidates eligibility was questionable according to Minor v. Happersett appears to have been known and handled by somebodys legal team....
(Excerpt) Read more at naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com ...
Leo Donofrio, Esq. has another (long) article laying out his case.
---- For those Star Trek fans, it seems the Borg drones have been busy on Obama's behalf.
Here is similiar thread from yesterday..
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2795619/posts
This is incredible that this is not getting more attention.
I don’t think that it was 25 opinions that were scrubbed but rather 25 locations in the justia.com website that were scrubbed in order to hide that one ruling.
Leo Donofrio is a paranoid idiot. Back when he first started freaking out over this, it took me just a matter of minutes to find numerous examples of citations missing during the same time frame that had nothing to do with Minor or citizenship.
....Leo Donofrio is a paranoid idiot. Back when he first started freaking out over this, it took me just a matter of minutes to find numerous examples of citations missing during the same time frame that had nothing to do with Minor or citizenship.....
Which ones? And does that mean anything? Was that an accident or done as cover for the other disappearances, to make it look like an accident? How about this below, another glitch?
New York State Board of Elections Website Blocking Access To Natural Born Citizen Requirements
By
Pixel Patriot
10/5/2011
Previous versions of the New York State Board of Elections website that listed the qualifications for the Presidential Candidates to be a Natural Born Citizen have not only been scrubbed, but their website has html source code embedded to prevent archiving and specifically coded to be excluded in archival sites such as the Way Back Machine.
http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2011/10/new-york-state-board-of-elections.html
ping.
Wrong, Baby, Wrong.
He is anything but paranoid.
Idiot? The guy is BRILLIANT! Now he can be a “jerk”. But he is a lawyer, so there you go.
“paranoid idiot” Leo Donofrio is NOT.
For those citing Minor for support of 0bama's eligibility, it seems others in the business of republishing legal opinions seem to fear too close of an examination of or attention to Minor.
Seems like the constant scrubbing of facts/opinions contrary to the 0bama narrative/myth, 0bama's lack of any meaningful transparency, the media's unquestioning support for the 'official' fairy tale, the keeping of school records and passport histories under lock and key - all point to the probability that there is one, more than one, or a mountain of troubling somethings there.
Leo Donofrio, Esq. has another (long) article laying out his case.
Thanks, Cicero.
“Leo Donofrio is a paranoid idiot.”
You’re only saying that because he used to claim that the lead singer of the Stone Roses was the reincarnated Messiah, and that he (Leo) was God’s spokesman on Earth.
Bump
I don’t know about you - but I don’t want ANYONE messing with material that they don’t own.
It would be one thing for Justia to remove all cases in which Minor v. Happersett was a citation entirely from its web site.
But, it is a different matter if you remove the citation from a case, but leave the case intact. You have then altered a document that you don’t own.
What if I was a law student and had to refer to a particular case - knowing that I had a test on the material the next day? Then I take the test and it asks for the citations. I know the citations cold EXCEPT for Minor v. Happersett - since it was removed from the text of the case by Justia ...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.