[Red_Devil 232]

You forgot to add include this paragraph:

"The statute covers a “person” authorized by any law of the US to make or give official writings. Justia.com is authorized – according to the federal Public Domain laws – to re-publish US Supreme Court opinions. In every case that was tampered, the words “Full Text of Case” appear on each scrubbed opinion. Since the cases were intentionally sabotaged by the removal of text, the affirmation at the top of each page which indicated that one is reading the “Full Text of Case” is knowingly false. It’s the inclusion of this intentionally false statement which makes this a crime under the statute."

[Bubba Ho-Tep]

You forgot to add include this paragraph:

I didn't forget. I posted the law that Leo is citing, not his interpretation. Do you agree that something being in the public domain means that everyone on the Planet Earth is now "a person authorized by any law of the United States to make or give a certificate or other writing" of that thing?

[DiogenesLamp]

"The statute covers a “person” authorized by any law of the US to make or give official writings. Justia.com is authorized – according to the federal Public Domain laws – to re-publish US Supreme Court opinions. In every case that was tampered, the words “Full Text of Case” appear on each scrubbed opinion. Since the cases were intentionally sabotaged by the removal of text, the affirmation at the top of each page which indicated that one is reading the “Full Text of Case” is knowingly false. It’s the inclusion of this intentionally false statement which makes this a crime under the statute."

Their defense will be "Mens Rea".

[tutstar]

Ping to 23 and more in thread. Not sure why someone posted this identical article a day later .