Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

But the slippery slope argument is all too real. ‘Assisted dying’ or ‘mercy killing’ open up the route to intolerable abuse of deeply vulnerable people, who may be put under pressure by greedy or uncaring relatives to end their lives. Or the person in question may simply not wish to ‘be a burden’ on their loved ones.

This is EXACTLY what happens whenever assisted suicide or euthanasia is allowed.

1 posted on 10/15/2011 1:39:34 PM PDT by wagglebee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: cgk; Coleus; cpforlife.org; narses; Salvation; 8mmMauser
Pro-Life Ping
2 posted on 10/15/2011 1:40:24 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 185JHP; 230FMJ; AKA Elena; Albion Wilde; Aleighanne; Alexander Rubin; Amos the Prophet; ...
Moral Absolutes Ping!

Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list.

FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
[ Add keyword moral absolutes to flag FR articles to this ping list ]


3 posted on 10/15/2011 1:42:07 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

And of course insurance companies love the idea.

Thankfully insurance companies don’t make government policy, until the government becomes the insurance company.


4 posted on 10/15/2011 1:49:53 PM PDT by Christian Engineer Mass (25ish Cambridge MA grad student. Many conservative Christians my age out there? __ Click my name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

That’s exactly right and that’s why, no matter how conflicted I have found myself on this issue, I always come back to No.


5 posted on 10/15/2011 1:53:28 PM PDT by workerbee (We're not scared, Maobama -- we're pissed off!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BykrBayb; floriduh voter; Lesforlife; Sun
Ping
8 posted on 10/15/2011 1:55:45 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

My problem is that I see both sides of the debate.

- There is a level of suffering that comes under the definition of ‘torture’. It is immoral to allow a fellow human being to suffer. (*I* don’t want to suffer any more)

BUT

- There are medications that can ease suffering - even going so far as to put someone in an induced coma to spare them.
- I am a firm believer of the ‘slippery slope’ argument. I’ve just seen it proven true too many times. Any acceptance of euthanasia will quickly turn into ‘putting grandma down because she’s inconvenient.’


I am a chronic pain sufferer. I have reached my limit many times.

The War on Drugs is contributing to this need for euthanasia. By denying people pain relief, you instill a sense of hopelessness that makes suicide a realistic option.

I, myself, have considered suicide many times as a result of undermedicated pain. Hell, the only reason I’m not dead now is that I haven’t exhausted every option available to me and I promised my family that I would do so before I took the dirt nap.

I don’t *want* to die, but many days I feel like I can’t go on living. What I’ve been going through for the last two years is not life. It is hell.

For those of you who are against euthanasia in every instance, I will say this: There are things worse than death. Open the doors to pain relief, and you do away with the need for euthanasia.

I do get furious that it’s my fellow conservatives who are so insistent on keeping the War on Drugs alive in it’s current form, then deny people who they’re hurting an ‘out’.

Put a 1/3rd of the money being spent on the WoD into rehab for addicts, get the gov’t out of my doctor’s office and you’ll be more effective.


9 posted on 10/15/2011 1:56:08 PM PDT by Marie (Cain 9s Have Teeth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee
How old is this quack? Anyone for putting him on the short list?

We are already half way down the slippery slope with abortion on demand. If we become accustomed to killing or allowing to be killed, the helpless, then God help us.

Obama has all but approved of this in his “health care LAW”, that must be overturned. As we age we become an inconvenient user of oxygen, space and treasure the government considers its own.

Our lives are to be valued from beginning (in the womb) to the end. I would hope that all fight to live and for life. End this evil thinking.

12 posted on 10/15/2011 1:59:51 PM PDT by BatGuano (You don't think I'd go into combat with loose change in my pocket, do ya?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

Assisted dying use to be called MURDER.


13 posted on 10/15/2011 2:21:31 PM PDT by hflynn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

My decisions to accept treatment or to decline treatment is one that stays between me and my God. It has nothing to do anyone else.
I am well aware of, and quite sensitive to the ‘wishes’ of others...in my immediate family, and beyond. However, that in no way serves as a substitute to the decisions that I make with the help of God.
Even in light of the ‘moral absolutes’ often espoused, I recognize that there is a point in life where my continued existence on this earthly plane is for naught; there will be nothing to be gained by extending my life. At that point, I have directed that my wishes be honored, via my personal DNR and NHM instructions.
That is my moral absolute.


14 posted on 10/15/2011 3:05:24 PM PDT by PubliusMM (RKBA; a matter of fact, not opinion. 01-20-2013: Change we can look forward to.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

People dying from COPD/Emphysema, are routinely administered dosages of morphine guaranteeing swift death. It is a merciful thing, and I cannot see anything wrong with it, if that is what the patient wants. If you live long enough, and are unlucky to the point of having a mother, aunt, or brother sucking at air, and receiving no benefit, you would think differently on this debate. I have lost 5+ relatives from emphysema, and the last real decision they made was to “ease on out”. I was there, and supported them completely.


16 posted on 10/15/2011 4:00:31 PM PDT by runninglips (Republicans = 99 lb weaklings of politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

Tell that Terri Schiavo and her family who husband and his lawyer murdered her; just like the government wants to do.


17 posted on 10/15/2011 4:08:37 PM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All
Pinged from Terri Dailies


20 posted on 10/16/2011 11:32:32 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee
Why do they have to kill people?

I understand if someone does not want further treatment and just wishes pain meds. I can understand DNRs. What I don't get is this push to actively kill people.

What kind of ghoul would want to kill someone? And yet this is exactly what they always push for.

21 posted on 10/16/2011 11:55:45 AM PDT by Harmless Teddy Bear (*Philosophy lesson 117-22b: Anyone who demands to be respected is undeserving of it.*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson