Posted on 10/12/2011 11:53:56 AM PDT by parksstp
The GOP ****in’ sucks, and that is all there is to it.
Whoa hoss! Unbunch yer panties.
Last night’s debate was watched by all 500 of us who actually get Bloomberg on cable.
Romney has had 6+ years of presidential campaigning under his belt. But he’ll never poll over 40% (evangelicals will stay home rather than vote for him).
Yes, Cain flubbed the Alan Greenspan question, but that was so inside baseball that only Ron Paul supporters got it.
Perry has proved again that he can’t think on his feet (or butt as was the case last night).
Huntsman’s (price of a pizza) and Bachmann’s (turn it upside down deviltry) jabs against Cain backfired.
Cain will build and build momentum.
Even dumb conservatives like me understand what a delicious sight it would be to see Cain and Dumb0 go head to head in the general. The self-made American black man against the media made half-white, mostly other half Arab Marxist.
Call it UFC 205. Can’t wait.
All these years have passed, and nothing has changed...except it is no longer George Washington some of us want to be our King and take care of us; while others want King obama, and still others...?????
The names have changed, and the names of what we choose to call the particular forms of enslavement we think we prefer...but really nothing’s changed—the very reason they can still play us like fiddles, and beat us like drums...
Hilarious, but it hurts if I even attempt to force a chuckle!
Semper Watching!
*****
I thought the debate was pretty good — they have the diversity thing pegged (they are not racists, chauvinists, ageists, etc.); they presented good answers, especially Bachmann to the leftist moderator: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wiLAibwTyaQ&feature=player_embedded
Gingrich had some interesting takes and Perry and Romney was not a blood bath encounter.
I’ve said it before, I’ll say it again — I look at this field and all I see is weakness. Not the “so-and-so is pretty good on the whole, but has some rough edges” type of weakness, but the “is this the best we can do?” kind of weakness.
I’d be uncomfortable at the thought of most of them being in the Oval Office. And the remaining few teeter close to that uncomfortable line.
I agree with you — I cannot see, based on this lackluster field, why Palin chose to sit it out. She was dominating the race without even being in it, and she should have been able to easily mop up this field of wanna-bes if she had joined the race in earnest.
I know! Let’s draft Fred Thompson!
*ducking*
Mitt Romney: More baggage than Delta Airlines loses in a year.
“I cannot see, based on this lackluster field, why Palin chose to sit it out”
i see a whole host of reasons:
well mostly its because the media did its job and made her look like a fool to the squishy middle that swing elections. she most likely could not get over the core 40% threshold in a general election.
she did herself no favors by having that reality show with a guest star from Kate from Jon and Kate plus 8 on it.
she also did herself no favors by resigning the Governorship looks like a quitter
she is also making a TON of money with speaking fees, book deals and her guest shots on Fox
When Palin bowed out, she took most of the fizz out of this race. The lackluster field wasn’t so intolerable while we were sitting here hoping she’d be getting in. Now it’s too late to find anyone better than the current lineup.
Perhaps if she had spoken up sooner...but no, the Palinhalers around here insisted she’d speak up “all in good time.”
I don’t say she hasn’t a right to do as she pleases, because she does. But I predicted that if she chose to sit it out, she’d be kingmaker, delivering Romney the nomination. And here he is, coasting confidently ahead of the pack.
Wow are you a clueless idiot.
Does he need to? No. He could win the nomination easily with less than that.
The problem is too many Americans are arrogantly ignorant children who confuses their emotional hysteric feelings for wisdom. You people are the sort of weak minded fools who lets the Junk Media tell you what to think.
You are the sort of knee jerk negative whiner who confuses hyperbolic negativity and mindless cynicism for "wisdom". The sort of ignorant clowns who thinks childish sneering at everyone and everything makes you look "smart".
ANY of the these candidates, even that moron Romney, would be a much much better President then 0.
To sleaze them as you people do indicates you have utterly NO clue at all what you are talking about. Obviously taking the time and effort to learn about these candidates, instead or mindless sneering at them, is way beyond your junior high school level intellectual abilities.
I believe he needs 50+1% of GOP delegate voters to get the nomination... unless my math is terribly wrong.
The problem is you are an arrogantly ignorant child who confuses your emotional hysteric ignorance for wisdom. You are the sort of weak minded fool who lets the Junk Media tell you what to think.
You are the sort of knee jerk negative whiner who confuses hyperbolic negativity and mindless cynicism for "wisdom". The sort of ignorant clown who thinks childish sneering at everyone and everything makes you look "smart". ANY of the these candidates would be a much much better President then 0.
To sleaze them as you do indicates you have utterly NO clue at all what you are talking about.
I have to respectfully (which is more than you did with respect to me) disagree. I look at all of the candidates and am immediately struck by their glaring faults more so than any positive qualities they have.
And “better than Obama” is hardly a standard in any sense of the word. We are rapidly approaching a crisis point that will require someone in office with the ability, will and proven history in fixing problems of that magnitude. Those with the will don’t have the history (and thus, we cannot judge ability, and the situation is too dire to take anyone on the “hope” that they have the ability). Those with the experience don’t have the ability or the will (or both!) to do what needs to be done.
This isn’t knee-jerk or emotional, but a highly rational look at the candidates. We need another Ronald Reagan. We’re going to be stuck with another GWHB/Dole/McCain if nothing drastic changes.
Yep.
Move on. It’s over.
Start preparing yourself now for some dark days ahead until 2016, which may be too late anyway. :(
” I thought the debate was pretty good — they have the diversity thing pegged (they are not racists, chauvinists, ageists, etc.); they presented good answers, especially Bachmann to the leftist moderator...”
I thought the entire field, except for Huntsman, comported themselves very well last night and laid out a fine case for conservative Republicans and for conservative principles they defended superbly. Bachman was excellent, Newt was the laser intellect as always, Cain exudes confidence, Santorum was passionate and prickly, Paul is a delight and you hear a pin drop when he speaks so bluntly, Perry came with his issues and record, Romney was the socialist defending conservativism /s. But it was the very best debate so far on substance. We’ve got substance.
He can arrive at the convention with fewer delegates than needed, and wrestle them out of the competition in under an hour. You have to know that. Do you think a tyro like Cain could stop him? What if the primaries result in, roughly, 40-20-15-15-10? He could take that majority he needs, with a phone call.
I do not understand how anyone here cannot read the writing on the wall.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.