The question needs to be asked in light of the numerous failures and abuses of the Justice Department under his tenure and the unpalatable fact that he is still employed there.
I started wondering about it this morning because a snippet of Web Hubbell's recording with his wife, "I need to roll over one more time" popped into my brain. He was willing to fall on his sword to protect Clinton, but what if Holder isn't?
The fallout from F&F could take years to unravel and could involve criminal charges. He's got to be worried about that.
Then there is the other side of the coin. Holder has been the point man tasked with blocking every one of the lawsuits challenging Obama's eligibility. He knows where all the bodies are buried because he buried most of them. So the Bamster says to him, "Holder ol' son, looks like you're gonna have to take a hike".
To which Holder replies, "Yeah right, Soetoro. I'll just do that little thing. Of course where I walk to might not be very convenient for you!"
Loyalty among thieves only goes so far.
According to the same rule (no loyalty among thieves), Holder would then get the Ron Brown treatment.
THIS.
If Obama throws withHolder under the bus, Eric might just start “remembering” things about “Obama”’s past that would prove devastating, to say the least. The administration will go to the mattress for the current AG, because he (Holder) has so much dirt on the fraud currently occupying the WH that the entire “Obama” regime would be utterly destroyed should Eric “my people” Holder sing, and every single thing that has been enacted under this illegitimate pResidency would then be dismantled.