This is so true, and outbreeding the perceived enemy is not an original idea. In the 1600’s when France was colonizing in Canada, women were urged to have large families, and female orphans in France were sent to Canada to marry and produce children (”daughters of the King”...he provided these girls with a dowry). When the British were beginning to wrest control of Canada from the French in the 1700’s, the women of French descent, were urged again to have even larger families, it was called “revenge of the cradle”. I know researching my husband’s family tree (the Catholic church in Canada kept wonderful records) he has ancestors who had 20-22 children with wife no. l, and when that poor, worn out woman passed on to her rewards, proceeded to do the same with wife no. 2.
save for later.
I remember reading once many years ago that some scientists claimed some day there would be no men, only women, and all reproduction would be artificial. At the time I said to myself “what a disaster if true”.
Well, now I think maybe the sooner the better. if every woman is only having 1 or 2 children, there is no way to sustain a population...UNLESS 100% of the population is women. Then it is sustainable. Maybe the west needs more female babies.
Very depressing news.
This is how we are blessed by abortion.