This is already true since the GOP never formally objected to Barry on the basis of his lack of constitutional eligibility. You don't even need to understand the legal precedents to understand that the founders of this country would not have wanted the child of a foreign national to be president of the united States, regardless of where he was born. Plenty of GOP members have either ignored the Constitution and/or made excuses for Barry that just don't wash. Why would they do any different for Rubio or Jindal, especially if they think these guys have a shot at winning the White House??
I look at laws this way...if a person murders someone and gets away with it...is that a new set precendent? We can now all go around murdering people.