Posted on 09/20/2011 8:28:54 AM PDT by Ordinary_American
this is why the pubies don’t push obama’s illegality,
because they have one in their own closet that
they’re going to promote.
You get the most flak when you’re right over the target.
You get the most flak when you’re right over the target.
You get the most flak when you’re right over the target.
You get the most flak when you’re right over the target.
You know the birther theories haven’t sold.
Rush Limbaugh predicts: Marco Rubio will be president
World Net Daily ^ | Sept. 7, 2011 | Joe Kovacs
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2775081/posts
Go Marco! :-)
Last I checked, Rubio is a Natural Born Citizen. If you were born in the U.S., you meet the definition. Your parents DO NOT have to be US Citizens.
Still pushing tripe, eh?
Remember - not one state, not one state legislature, not one state DA, not one member of Congress and no courts agree with you legal theory.
Maybe that is because they can read...
unless they are born by caesarian section - not natural
Obama’s ineligibility: Marco Rubio can’t be President or Vice President
To be a natural born citizen means BOTH parents must be US Citizens.
Much the same that illegals born here in the US are still Mexican citizens because their parents are Mexican citizens.
The Supreme Court defined natural born as “all children born in the country to parents who were its citizens.” No ruling has ever overturned this definition, which was followed as legal precedent.
Let’s be clear...
If you were born in the US, you meet “a” definition of natural born citizen.
I don’t subscribe to that definition, as I believe the Founders original intent was a requirement that both parents must be citizens. A point that has been aptly demonstrated on manyu of these threads.
If not “clearly” defined, then you must look to the original intent.
That’s funny (in a sort of “it makes as much sense as applying Swiss law and not English law to define ‘natural born’” sort of way).
if you really wanna push it, why not disqualify anyone that wasn’t born in one of the original 13 colonies? obviously, since, say, california didn’t exist at the writing of the constitution, the framers couldn’t have possibly intended for people that were born there to be qualified to be president.
Ron Paul got a lot of flak for implying Bush was behind 9/11.
Gerald Ford got a lot of flak for saying Poland wasn't a communist country.
Were they "right over the target"?
You are correct, however will be not both be slammed.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.