Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ANN Coulter + LAURA Ingraham = PALIN ENVY
9/8/2011 | vanity

Posted on 09/08/2011 10:46:53 AM PDT by CondoleezzaProtege

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-239 next last
To: reasonisfaith

THANK you reasonisfaith...It shows they don’t care more about conservatism as to how it can help put them in the limelight, not because they will fight tooth and nail for genuine change to come to this country!


41 posted on 09/08/2011 11:26:58 AM PDT by CondoleezzaProtege (Palin 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Past Your Eyes

Truth needs to be exposed and the conservative movement needs new blood. People who care genuinely about the people of this country and not just their own limelight.


42 posted on 09/08/2011 11:29:00 AM PDT by CondoleezzaProtege (Palin 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: CondoleezzaProtege

If you somehow think you have advanced the cause, you are sadly mistaken.


43 posted on 09/08/2011 11:32:52 AM PDT by Past Your Eyes (I'm sticking with Herman. No more second terms!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: C. Edmund Wright

When did you get hired by Coulter?

Your comments sound a lot like one of her employees. Just trying to see were you are coming from.


44 posted on 09/08/2011 11:35:21 AM PDT by TrumpisRight (President Palin sounds so good....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: cuban leaf

I used to think the opposite: I loved Ann’s books and column, but could not stand her live. The giggling, the hair tossing, the short black dresses, and the tiresome effort of her attempting in vain to making a point.

Now I am turned off almost completely of both. Her incessant pushing of RINO Christie and her friendships with Maher and Joy Baher says reams about her. I think Ann and Laura figured they were the conservative QueenBabes and now are very threatened by Palin.


45 posted on 09/08/2011 11:36:58 AM PDT by AnnGora (For a copy of this tagline, send 19.99 to Copy of Tagline, Pueblo, CO...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: CondoleezzaProtege

Point for all to ponder RE this issue.

For YEARS now, the Con/Right has had a mere hanful of people willing to stand up for us (comparitively) voiceless masses (those without a network soapbox/radio show).

Coulter and Inghram have been two of those voices for many of us for years and done an outstanding job until recently.

If we take Palin off the table completely, Coulter has been on the downswing for sometime, between her GOProud support and slamming a significant portion of conservatives over the birther issue. Regardless of truth or fiction, POing half the base is pretty freaking stupid considering she knows the “truth” no more than we do. It’s all speculation at this point and likely will remain so for years.

Inghram has more recently shown RINO tendencies and has also led many here to begin questioning her true loyalties. She, like Coulter, brought all this suspicion on themselves by their very own actions. No one started a Dem whisper campaign against them. They did it to themselves.

Now Palin enters the mix and they go negative based on the very same facilities that swirl around the minds of the Palin thread trolls.

Perspective people. Perspective. For all the good they did and may still do for the conservative cause, Neither Coulter, nor Inghram are above scrutiny.

Nor is Palin. Yes, I, Sara Palin supporter said that. And I believe it 100%

But all three must be scrutinized in light of THEIR OWN ACTIONS, not anyone elses. And that scrutiny must be bases on fact and reality, not speculation and “I want!” projection.

NO ONE is above criticism. No one. Just make sure it’s based in FACT, not in EMOTION.

FWIW


46 posted on 09/08/2011 11:37:20 AM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Calif4Palin

Well, a couple observations.

First, your reading is selective or not with much comprehension if you reached that conclusion. Perhaps read again.

Second, your screen name shows that only ONE OF US is “coming” from anywhere. Another of us is simply calling it like he sees it. Or put another way, maybe one of us knows the professional histories of all three women.


47 posted on 09/08/2011 11:38:56 AM PDT by C. Edmund Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: CondoleezzaProtege; Jim Robinson
I think I've discovered Ann's problem.

This was then.

This is now.


48 posted on 09/08/2011 11:41:00 AM PDT by McGruff (Why settle for second best.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CondoleezzaProtege

It’s been a dissappointment to see how catty these two have been.


49 posted on 09/08/2011 11:42:57 AM PDT by Tijeras_Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mortrey
if Palin won the presidency, so many problems would be fixed

Can you name any problem our country had that any politician has "fixed".

50 posted on 09/08/2011 11:43:06 AM PDT by Dick Tater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: PhiloBedo

*Ouch*


51 posted on 09/08/2011 11:45:27 AM PDT by Tijeras_Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Dick Tater

Sure. Ronalus Magnus - The existence of the Soviet Union. ;)

Other than that, not so much.


52 posted on 09/08/2011 11:46:17 AM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Dick Tater

Obama got rid of Hillary.


53 posted on 09/08/2011 11:47:01 AM PDT by Past Your Eyes (I'm sticking with Herman. No more second terms!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: CondoleezzaProtege
I think you have made some good points, but did not go far enough on either of these women.

I was a fairly big fan of Ann,and even met her as she was the Guest of Honor at our Republican Women's Convention in Clearwater a few years ago. she has changed dramatically since then, and has quite frankly gone off the deep end on a number of issues. She is jealous and envious of Sarah for a number of reasons, the biggest reason is that Sarah is a happily Married woman with 5 children and a hunky husband that you know the way he looks at her he loves her madly. Ann hangs out(barhopping) with a woman hating,ugly,totally looney tunes in Bill Maher.

Ann is very unhappy because she has accomplishments, but no Family. Her Mother passed away so there is nobody to give her sage advice, and consequently she seems out of control with her Mouth and behavior at times.

I had a personally Autographed copy of one of her books which I threw in the garbage after some of her nutty,erratic diatribes about fellow conservatives and decent Republicans. She has been going downhill for years, but I dismissed much of what she says after I tossed her book.

Laura is another story. I used to watch her on NBC a least 12 years ago,and even then she was a little strange trying to be conservative on a Liberal Network. Her afternoon show was cancelled and I guess she learned from that to do what ever she could to stay in the limelight. She demeans herself and is subservient to Oreilly just to stay as his sub host. She even sounds and acts like that Loofah lover and self loving jerk. I cannot watch her anymore, her body language makes me cringe. How low can she go?

I have so many more points to make,but you get my drift, and I have lots of things to do as I am a 24-7 caregiver.

54 posted on 09/08/2011 11:47:38 AM PDT by samantha (Sarah is our TEAple. candidate for America the Beautiful...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: CondoleezzaProtege

Thank you for posting what needs to be said.


55 posted on 09/08/2011 12:02:10 PM PDT by reasonisfaith (Governor Palin: "I'm not for sale.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: CondoleezzaProtege

No one holds conservative men accountable for the politics of the women in their lives. What does anyone know about the voting records of Mrs. Hannity, Mrs. O’Reilly, Mrs. Limbaugh, etc.? No one asks. And that’s as it should be.

That Nancy Reagan supports fetal stem cell research is not an indictment of Ronald Reagan.

Conservative women should get the same consideration. They aren’t responsible for someone else’s politics.


56 posted on 09/08/2011 12:03:09 PM PDT by Blue Ink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Dick Tater

The tax structure in Alaska was a problem until a couple of years ago.

The inability to legislate a way to tap into natural gas reserves was a problem for a long time that also met the blade of Palin’s axe.


57 posted on 09/08/2011 12:06:10 PM PDT by reasonisfaith (Governor Palin: "I'm not for sale.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: cuban leaf

Yeah, I get that a lot. ;-)


58 posted on 09/08/2011 12:06:49 PM PDT by Ted Grant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: C. Edmund Wright

I’ll be concise: Coulter is wrong.


59 posted on 09/08/2011 12:07:34 PM PDT by reasonisfaith (Governor Palin: "I'm not for sale.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: CondoleezzaProtege; All

You people are a riot.


60 posted on 09/08/2011 12:07:42 PM PDT by EveningStar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-239 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson