Posted on 09/05/2011 9:05:32 PM PDT by CaroleL
Texas Governor Rick Perry provided a glimpse of the kind of president he might be when he skipped the chance to participate in a nationally televised political forum to do his job. Mr. Perry was slated to appear with other GOP presidential contenders at Senator Jim DeMint's (R-South Carolina) Palmetto Freedom Forum on Labor Day, but instead he rushed back to work as a roaring wildfire raced across Central Texas.
(Excerpt) Read more at talkingsides.com ...
You have no connection to that? What? Really?
No, actually I don’t know that.
Oh lord, now the Palinistas have to whine like little beechees to the moderators because their goddess has been besmirched.....by the word quim. Yoo funny.
Grow a spine.
Do you ever wonder if your adoration of Mama Grizz is no different than the One We’ve All Been Waiting For in 2008?
Man,you sure ran out of ammo quickly.
As I told naps, all I have to do is turn on my state/local news. In every word and picture they prove that this thing that happened in the hours that Perry rushed back is not like anything that happened prior. It is beyond, beyond anything anyone has ever seen.
Instead, naps tried to palm off the falsehood that this is all part of what Perry knew for days was happening and just didn’t care, then only pretended to care by going back. Then accused me of posting the facts I did only because I have a Perry agenda.
Even said it was because I’m from Texas that I posted it (the truth, actually, in the face of lies).
That was the issue before the crude post referencing Sarah Palin was posted.
That inappropriate crudity doesn’t change what naps did to this thread and what the exchange up until then, and after, has been about.
FR is not a porn site. You need to tone down your disparaging references to female anatomy and sexual inferences. It has no place in debate, no matter who your candidate is. This kind of crap is status quo on Dem sites, never has been on FR.
“You need to tone down your disparaging references to female anatomy and sexual inferences. It has no place in debate, no matter who your candidate is.”
Gosh, I didn’t know my wayback machine had transported me to Victorian England.
Calling the Palin sycophants for what they are has brought out the conveniently prudish.
Your posts are disgusting and not worthy of this site. I have no problem with reading criticisms of Palin, Bachmann or any other WOMEN running for office. Your references to anatomy are low. It shows you have no class and are losing in your arguments.
“You may want to take that up with the Boss...”
BWAAHAHAHAHA
The boss of who?
You?
It looks like you are looking for a zot. I hope your wishes will be answered.
lol. Yes you say a crude thing about Sarah Palin and blame me. How adult of you. Control yourself for a change.
What I find interesting and worthy of mocking is the same mindless cult of personality directed towards Sarah Palin in 2011 as was directed towards Barack Obama in 2008.
Well, considering he OWNS this site, and it happens to be ‘private property’, who do YOU think is the boss?
Well, I guess if Jim wants to ban me from the site for merely mocking you Palin sycophants, I’ll just have to suck it up and survive somehow.
Who are you for?? Please answer.
Well, I guess Jim wanted to. Your ZOT is from the boss.
Hammer time....
Please let me know if you want ON or OFF my Viking Kitty/ZOT ping list!. . . don't be shy.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.