Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Facts and Truth About U.S. Inflation, Debt, and Political Crisis
NIA ^ | 8.19.2011 | National Inflation Association

Posted on 08/19/2011 6:38:25 PM PDT by Razzz42

The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) yesterday released their consumer price index (CPI) data for the month of July. The BLS reported an increase in year-over-year CPI growth to 3.63%, the highest rate of U.S. price inflation since October of 2008. July's official government reported year-over-year U.S. price inflation rate of 3.63% was up from 3.56% in June, 3.57% in May, 3.16% in April, 2.68% in March, 2.11% in February, 1.63% in January, 1.5% in December, and 1.1% in November.

The official rate of U.S. price inflation has increased by 230% over the last eight months. NIA conservatively projects the official rate of U.S. price inflation to surpass 4% by year-end and 5% in early 2012. NIA estimates the real rate of U.S. price inflation, without geometric weighting and hedonics, to currently be approaching 8%. NIA projects the real rate of U.S. price inflation to reach double-digit territory by mid-2012, if not much sooner.

Gold prices today reached a new all time high of $1,877 per ounce. Gold is the best gauge of inflation, not the CPI. On June 15th when the BLS reported May CPI data, gold was trading for only $1,520 per ounce. Even though the BLS reported a year-over-year CPI increase for the month of May of 3.16%, the mainstream media reported that inflation was slowing down and not a problem because gas prices were declining. Although seasonal adjusted gas prices in the month of May were down 2%, NIA reported to you that non-adjusted gas prices actually rose 3.6%. NIA then warned you that the BLS's seasonal adjustments will reverse beginning in the month of July and start boosting reported gas prices.

NIA was right, seasonal adjusted gas prices in the month of July increased 4.7%. The mainstream media intentionally misled Americans about price inflation during the month of June, but the world is now recognizing the truth about how U.S. price inflation is spiraling out of control with the price of gold having risen 23% since mid-June. The investment community is also finally realizing what NIA has been saying for years, inflation does not create real economic growth.

The Dow Jones declined today by 172.93 points to 10,817.65 and the Dow Jones/Gold ratio fell to 5.84. The Dow Jones/Gold ratio is declining at a faster rate than even we expected. NIA was one of the only organizations in the world to accurately predict that the Dow Jones/Gold ratio would decline to 6.5 in 2011. NIA continues to believe that the Dow Jones/Gold ratio will decline to 1 this decade, which will mean another 83% loss for Dow Jones stocks in terms of real money.

The lower the stock market declines in the near-term, the greater the chances are that the Federal Reserve will soon unleash QE3 in disguise under a new name. Despite gold reaching a new all time high, the core-CPI, which the Federal Reserve likes to use to gauge inflation because it excludes food and energy prices, is currently up 1.77% on a year-over-year basis, compared to an annual gain of 0.61% in October of last year. Even though core-CPI growth appears to still be low, year-over-year core-CPI growth has increased by 290% since October of last year, a larger gain on a percentage basis than the official CPI. Ever since the Federal Reserve announced QE2 in November of last year, core-CPI has increased for nine straight months.

By the time the 2012 Presidential election comes around, inflation will be the top concern on the minds of all Americans. Inflation will be an even bigger concern than unemployment, because nobody will want to have a job that pays them a salary in U.S. dollars. The only Presidential candidate who has the knowledge and courage necessary to preserve what little purchasing power the U.S. dollar still has left is Ron Paul. NIA supports Ron Paul to become the Republican nominee in the 2012 U.S. Presidential election. To become the Republican nominee, Ron Paul will need to win the Republican presidential primaries. Unlike the general election to be held on November 6th, 2012, the Republican primaries are a series of primary elections and caucuses that are spread out over five months beginning in February.

Iowa is always the first state to vote and will have their caucuses on February 6th, followed by New Hampshire on February 14th, Nevada on February 18th, and South Carolina on February 28th. The results of the first few primaries/caucuses usually influence how people will vote in the following primaries/caucuses. It is important for a candidate to build momentum early on. If a candidate doesn't have a strong showing in early primary states, they frequently drop out of the race before all of the primaries/caucuses are completed.

The way the primaries are structured gives voters in early primary states, especially voters in Iowa, a lot of power compared to voters in states like New York who very often don't vote until the nominee has already been determined. About six months before every Iowa Republican primary is the Ames Straw Poll, an unofficial Presidential straw poll that takes place in Ames, Iowa, of who Iowa voters are planning to support in their caucuses. The 2011 Ames Straw Poll just took place on August 13th with Michele Bachmann finishing first place with 4,823 votes and Ron Paul coming in second with 4,671 votes, only 152 votes behind Bachmann.

To attend the Ames Straw Poll and have the opportunity to vote in the poll, attendees were required to purchase a ticket priced at $30. Bachmann gave her supporters 6,000 free tickets at a cost to her campaign of $180,000. Only 80% of the people she gave free tickets to actually voted for her and that's assuming none of the people who bought tickets voted for her. Bachmann didn't just pay for the entrance of 6,000 people who she thought supported her, but she paid a small fortune to have Grammy Award winning country singer Randy Travis perform in a special air-conditioned tent. Bachmann even paid to transport forty bus loads of Randy Travis fans to the event, who were required to register at the Bachmann table and vote before seeing the entertainment.

With Bachmann spending a total of nearly $1 million on this event, she should have won the straw poll in a blow out. Click on the link below to see a shocking video we just posted to the NIA blog of the never ending line of Bachmann "supporters" registering at her table so that they could vote without paying the $30 fee. NIA believes that many of these people pretended to support her in order to get free tickets, but actually voted for Ron Paul: http://inflation.us/blog/2011/08/crazy-video-of-bachmann-ames-straw-poll-line/

The morning after Bachmann's phony victory, she appeared on five different nationwide talk shows. Ron Paul wasn't allowed to appear on any, with both 'Meet the Press' and 'Fox News Sunday' canceling interviews they had scheduled with him. Meet the Press spent the morning talking about Bachmann's win and Tim Pawlenty dropping out of the race after finishing third with less than half of the votes of Bachmann and Ron Paul. They barely mentioned Ron Paul even when he finished in a statistical dead heat with Bachmann.

Even more frustrating and disturbing, the Wall Street Journal published a long article Sunday morning about the race and it focused almost entirely on Bachmann's straw poll win and Rick Perry's entry into the race. The article only had one sentence about Ron Paul that read, “Libertarian Ron Paul, who has no chance to win the nomination, finished a close second.” On Monday morning, Ron Paul was scheduled to appear on NBC’s 'Today' show, but that interview was canceled as well with an NBC official saying it was due to "logistics and timing reasons with the news in Indiana and Somalia."

The mainstream media believes that if they repeat "Ron Paul has no chance of winning" enough times, it will be a self-fulfilling prophecy. The same applies to the media constantly referring to Mitt Romney as the front-runner. The media supports Romney because they like how he is a part of the Republican establishment and if elected would stick with the status quo in Washington.

Four years ago when Ron Paul was relatively unknown, Romney was the winner of the 2007 Ames Straw Poll. Rudy Giuliani and John McCain, who were both also seeking the 2008 Republican presidential nomination, chose not to participate in the 2007 Ames Straw Poll. Romney at the time in his own words called Giuliani and McCain cowards. Romney said, "I think if they thought they could have won, they would have been here," and "If you can't compete in the heartland, if you can't compete in Iowa in August, how are you going to compete in January when the caucuses are held, and how are you going to compete in November of '08?"

NIA believes that if Romney thought that he could have won the 2011 Ames Straw Poll, he would have been there. Romney knows that he lost all of his grassroots supporters when he spoke out in favor of the Federal Reserve's destructive monetary policies and said Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke was doing a good job. Romney showed his true colors when he said that the Federal Reserve is a non-issue and that he won't be discussing it during his campaign. He has now proven himself to be a hypocrite who was scared of looking bad by losing to Ron Paul in the straw poll and losing his "front-runner" status that was handed to him by the mainstream media. If Romney was afraid to compete in Iowa this month, NIA sees no chance of him winning in Iowa this February and no chance of him winning the Republican nomination.

With Iowa voters having a lot of power being in the first primary state, Iowa residents have spent more time researching the candidates than residents of most other states. Because Iowa voters are educated on the issues, especially issues affecting the economy, the media knew Ron Paul would have a strong showing in the Ames Straw Poll and for weeks leading up to it ran countless stories designed to downplay the poll and make it seem irrelevant. One Fox News reporter even went as far as saying that winning the straw poll is a negative and makes it nearly impossible to win the nomination. None of these things were said before the poll in 2007 because the media knew their darling Romney would win.

All educated Americans who understand the facts and truth about the U.S. economy and inflation are in strong support of Ron Paul because of his 24 year record in Congress of voting against increases in government spending and taxes, and voting for measures to strengthen our currency and reduce monetary inflation. Ron Paul stands for everything that NIA believes in such as liberty, freedom, and sound money. He has done more to protect the U.S. Constitution than any other person in Washington. Our founding fathers had the foresight 224 years ago to see the economic problems we have today. Even back then, rulers of nations had a history of coin clipping, replacing the silver in coins with base metals, and implementing other measures that stole from the purchasing power of ordinary citizens. Our founding fathers never would have imagined just how easy it has become to create inflation, where now the Federal Reserve with the click of a mouse can credit trillions of dollars to any banking institution worldwide.

For years, the media has dismissed Ron Paul's fight against the Federal Reserve and its destruction of the U.S. dollar. The media calls Ron Paul's ideas radical, but NIA believes Ron Paul is the most sane person in Washington. NIA believes balancing the budget, auditing the Federal Reserve, returning to a gold standard, and bringing our troops home from the Middle East, are all sane ideas that must be implemented if we want to have any hope of avoiding hyperinflation.

Rick Perry, the governor of Texas who just entered the race for the Republican presidential nomination, was recently asked about the Federal Reserve and in response he called Bernanke's acts of printing money "treasonous". NIA was the first to call Bernanke's actions treasonous. Back on December 9th of last year, NIA released an article entitled "WikiLeaks, Bernanke, and Hyperinflation" in which NIA said that it was "deeply disturbed by how U.S. politicians and the mainstream media have been calling for WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange to be charged with treason." Although in no way does NIA support Assange or his actions, we expressed in our article how we don't believe it is a treasonous act to help spread the truth about our country's foreign policy and other sensitive topics when the information he posted was given to him and in no way did he hack any government systems to obtain it.

NIA went on to state in its December 9th article, "If there is one American who deserves to be charged with treason, it is Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke." It is not humanly possible to betray ones country in a way that is more egregious than Bernanke's despicable acts. NIA is currently in the process of producing a sequel to its critically acclaimed documentary 'Meltup', which has received over 1.1 million views with 96% of its viewers "liking" the movie and only 4% "disliking" it, a record for YouTube documentaries at least 50 minutes in length with over 1 million views. NIA's sequel to 'Meltup' will expose the latest updated facts and truth about the U.S. economy, Federal Reserve, and inflation. It will set a whole new standard as the most in-depth, informative, educational, and entertaining economic documentary ever produced. Most importantly, it will expose why Bernanke's actions are indeed treasonous.

As far as Rick Perry is concerned, he is really no different than Romney. Perry like Romney is a governor who was elected to office due to his strong ties to the Republican establishment. Both Perry and Romney according to many media pundits look very Presidential. You will never hear Perry or Romney speak a word about bringing our troops home, repealing legislation that invades Americans' privacy rights without making us any safer here at home, and eliminating entire departments of government including the Department of Education, Department of Energy, Department of Commerce, Department of Health and Human Services, and Department of Homeland Security. These unnecessary bureaucracies have done nothing but add to our budget deficits, without a single success story to justify their existence.

Perry is not a true fiscal conservative. He and his wife complained that the Texas governor's mansion was too small and is now spending $11 million of President Obama's stimulus money to renovate and expand its size. With the construction now taking place at the governor's mansion and Perry unable to live there, Texas taxpayers have so far spent $700,000 to rent him an even bigger Texas mansion and to cover expenses at the mansion including Neiman Marcus window coverings and a subscription to Food & Wine Magazine.

What is unbelievable to us is that Perry for the most part has been a career politician, yet he has somehow managed to become a multi-millionaire while spending nearly all of his time in public office earning a relatively modest salary. Of course, if Perry was elected President, nothing much will change from the Obama administration and within a few years, he might become a multi-billionaire because a billionaire will be the new millionaire. Make no mistake about it, Perry may be trying to differentiate himself from Romney by speaking out against the Fed, but as President of the United States of America, NIA guarantees that Perry wouldn't do a damn thing to limit the Fed's powers and stop it from wiping out both the savings of senior citizens and the purchasing power of their Social Security checks. Perry is already in the pocket of the big banks and we just posted an 11 second video on the NIA blog that proves it: http://inflation.us/blog/2011/08/shocking-video-bank-of-america-executive-offers-to-help-out-rick-perry/

Tomorrow, Saturday, August 20th, is Ron Paul's birthday. To celebrate his birthday and help build momentum for his Presidential campaign, Ron Paul supporters have organized a huge "moneybomb" that starts at midnight tonight. If you would like to give Ron Paul the best possible birthday President and help increase the chances of our nation's survival, please make a donation beginning at midnight tonight by going to: http://www.ronpaul2012.com/

It is important to spread the word about NIA to as many people as possible, as quickly as possible, if you want America to survive hyperinflation. Please tell everybody you know to become members of NIA for free immediately at: http://inflation.us


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: inflation; paul; perry
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
For what it is worth.

Per the article: NIA is not in favor of Bachmann, not in favor of Perry, NIA likes Ron Paul.

Covers quite of bit of ground, arrived in my e-mail.

1 posted on 08/19/2011 6:38:30 PM PDT by Razzz42
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Razzz42

CPI up 3.63 percent but still no COLA for Social Security people and federal and postal retirees. Government needs that money to buy more votes.


2 posted on 08/19/2011 6:45:11 PM PDT by Ciexyz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Razzz42
The Dow Jones declined today by 172.93 points to 10,817.65 and the Dow Jones/Gold ratio fell to 5.84. The Dow Jones/Gold ratio is declining at a faster rate than even we expected. NIA was one of the only organizations in the world to accurately predict that the Dow Jones/Gold ratio would decline to 6.5 in 2011. NIA continues to believe that the Dow Jones/Gold ratio will decline to 1 this decade, which will mean another 83% loss for Dow Jones stocks in terms of real money.

Gold is a commodity like wheat or oil. It has not been tied to money for a long time. In 2000 it had the same or lower value than in 1980 so it does not even keep up with inflation. Now it is up because people are buying it, like oil a couple of years ago.
3 posted on 08/19/2011 7:37:38 PM PDT by microgood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: microgood

Because you can’t manufacture or grow gold, it is a confidence indicator and a place to store wealth in troubled times as you can only fit so many cows in your kitchen.

Since June/2002 gold has risen over 450% in US dollar pricing.

Once the dust settles, and it still could take years and years more, you exchange gold for whatever paper currency is in vogue. Provided you have any gold to exchange.


4 posted on 08/19/2011 8:26:20 PM PDT by Razzz42
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Razzz42

Gas prices declined in July.

Inflation will not be a bigger concern in 2012 than unemployment. It is at least 16% now and will get worse next year. That will be the most important economic concern.

Gold is a speculative venture. Speculative ventures rise and fall for reasons of their own not just predictions of inflation. At one time in the Netherlands there was a wild speculative mania which hit in TULIPS. Single tulip bulbs were bid into the thousands of dollars even tens of thousands. That is what we are seeing with gold.


5 posted on 08/19/2011 8:38:51 PM PDT by arrogantsob (Why do They hate her so much?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: arrogantsob
Inflation will not be a bigger concern in 2012 than unemployment. It is at least 16% now and will get worse next year. That will be the most important economic concern.

I tend to agree with you, but there are some very interesting undercurrents. First, headline inflation is being touted as the U3 number which is 9.1%. That is high enough, but few people understand the U6 number. Unemployment should be the bigger concern, but the reporting of data is skewed away from reality.

Second, many people I talk to don't buy the 3% inflation being touted because the necessities they must buy, such as food, are rising much more than that. People see the direct impact to their budget on a weekly basis, which is a strong reminder.

To the unemployed, unemployment will be a key concern. To the employed, whose 401Ks and IRAs are taking a hit because of the economic panic, the concern could go either way.

Either way, there is plenty of economic worry that will be around in 2012.

6 posted on 08/19/2011 8:59:41 PM PDT by mlocher (Is it time to cash in before I am taxed out?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: arrogantsob

Just because I post certain things doesn’t mean I whole heartily believe in what is being presented or put forth.

Mainly I use my post for review of the past and present for understanding the future (events) as what I post never is via the mainstream media. While some well founded points are scattered amongst mainstream media news articles, they are far and few between. Most of my posts contain a concentration of facts almost to the point of knowledge overload.

Everything cycles as nothing moves in a straight line. Gold is in a bull market cycle, started 10 years ago and at this rate could run another 10 years since politics never get anything right (lending to a lack of confidence).


7 posted on 08/19/2011 9:05:22 PM PDT by Razzz42
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Razzz42

Just a thought....

Cheer up! The worst is yet to come!


8 posted on 08/19/2011 9:24:55 PM PDT by hapnHal (hapnHal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ciexyz

“CPI up 3.63 percent but still no COLA for Social Security people and federal and postal retirees. Government needs that money to buy more votes.”

If you work in the private sector, the concept of COLA does not exist. The company I work for has not given wage increases in six years.


9 posted on 08/20/2011 3:13:29 AM PDT by Soul of the South (When times are tough the tough get going.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mlocher

Many, if not most, people are insulted from the full impact of inflation because home prices are dropping not rising and rents are falling. Homeowners have their largest expenditure fixed so that reduces inflation impact.

I see no possibility for high inflation rates because home prices are going the other way. One consequence of this is the collapse of the construction industry which increases unemployment. Therefore, another characteristic of inflation, rapidly escalating wages, is not going to be a problem.

However, even homeowners are worried about unemployment since they do not view their jobs as secure.


10 posted on 08/20/2011 1:44:46 PM PDT by arrogantsob (Why do They hate her so much?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Razzz42

We can hardly get too many articles about economics and finance, two critical subjects which are ignored by the vast majority and understood by a tiny minority even here.


11 posted on 08/20/2011 1:47:46 PM PDT by arrogantsob (Why do They hate her so much?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: arrogantsob
Buying little pieces of paper with company names on them with fiat paper money is much better than owning gold. /sarc

The Roman Empire thrived on the gold standard. So could we.

12 posted on 08/20/2011 2:07:25 PM PDT by central_va ( I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: arrogantsob
Thanks for the thoughtful reply. Your view of inflation (rising prices) is very similar to that of the fed. Paraphrasing in my words, we won't see much inflation until we see an increase in the velocity of money. Your view would suggest that we are on the edge of a depression, a view I certainly cannot argue.

Another intersting point you alluded to is that it is not inflation unless it is a rise in both prices and wages. What we really are seeing is a lowering in our standard of living since wages are not keeping pace with prices.

13 posted on 08/20/2011 4:39:32 PM PDT by mlocher (Is it time to cash in before I am taxed out?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: mlocher; central_va

There is no definitive definition of ‘inflation’ that’s why it gets confusing intermixing each others perception of anything rising (or not rising).

Usually there is debt to payoff so printing of money takes place leading to repercussions with the value of the currency being used. Then this starts affecting prices/wages/taxes/confidence/attitude and just about everything else if spending gets out of control.

As the mere fact of printing does not start inflation but a series of conditions must be in place where it seems in the end that only the things you need go up in price and things you don’t need are cheaper to buy.

In the end, it is confidence in the currency in use that gives it value whether gold or bright shiny beads.


14 posted on 08/20/2011 6:17:22 PM PDT by Razzz42
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: mlocher

Unfortunately, I do see us as being on the edge of a depression. One of the virtues of Keynes’ theories is recognition of the psychological aspects of capitalism. That psychology is almost destroyed by the Obama regime. This psychological change is one reason that (in my view) the velocity of circulation has dropped, in addition to the typical drop during recessions.

Another point of interest is that, since we have gone onto a floating exchange rate international monetary system, it becomes possible for us to export much of the inflation as long as foreigners are willing to hold dollars. Under the fixed exchanges trade imbalances would be translated into gold transfers which would reduce the domestic money supply and slow economic activity and thereby lower imports. That mechanism is gone now.


15 posted on 08/20/2011 8:17:24 PM PDT by arrogantsob (Why do They hate her so much?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: arrogantsob
That psychology is almost destroyed by the Obama regime. This psychological change is one reason that (in my view) the velocity of circulation has dropped, in addition to the typical drop during recessions.

Excellent observation! The psychology goes well beyond the consumer. Small businesses are naturally slow to hire, but so are big businesses. The rules for Obamacare and the Financial Reform Bill are unknown, so the risk for employers to hire are currently unknown. So, why hire?

16 posted on 08/20/2011 8:35:33 PM PDT by mlocher (Is it time to cash in before I am taxed out?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: central_va

The Roman Empire thrived on slavery and war. It stole gold wherever it could find it and destroyed whatever stood in its way. We aren’t going to start attacking nations and looting them. But it was not on a gold standard in any case but was bi-metallic at best.

And it was only in the best of times that there was any kind of stable metallic standard. Most of the times the coins were washed, clipped and adulterated far short of their claimed weight.

The simple fact is gold and silver supplies do not grow rapidly enough to keep the economies from deflating. The economy must grow by 3% per year in order to lower unemployment. Gold and silver supplies have grown at under 2% per year for the last 500 yrs. And that includes the hoards taken from the Incas and Aztecs, something that will not be repeated.

With rapid growth in the industrial and jewelry uses of these metals we will be lucky to see expansion greater than 1% per year. Permanent recession would be the result of going to a gold standard.


17 posted on 08/20/2011 8:47:23 PM PDT by arrogantsob (Why do They hate her so much?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Razzz42
There is no definitive definition of ‘inflation’ that’s why it gets confusing intermixing each others perception of anything rising (or not rising).

I thought your entire post was thought provoking, but I don't fully agree with the above quote. At a high level, there is a very good understanding of inflation, "too many dollars chasing too few goods." Drill down and there have been many good measures used that are inflation indicators. One of the problems that adds to the perception problem that you assert (and I do agree with) is that these measures change definition too frequently. The longer the time span that they are used, the less accurate a measure they become.

18 posted on 08/20/2011 8:49:10 PM PDT by mlocher (Is it time to cash in before I am taxed out?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Razzz42
Ron Paul may turn out, like Churchill, to be wrong about everything except the One Big Thing.

Most living Americans do not understand the difference between credit and money. Perhaps they are about to find out.

19 posted on 08/20/2011 8:56:05 PM PDT by Jim Noble (To live peacefully with credit-based consumption and fiat money, men would have to be angels.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: arrogantsob

Defend the paper fiat system. We are seeing its demise right now. My GOLD is up. Way up. Stocks? PFffeww. Weimar Republic here we come.


20 posted on 08/21/2011 4:43:01 AM PDT by central_va ( I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson