To: exDemMom
If I were going to assume a created system, first of all, I would not expect adaptive changes, since presumably, components of the created system would have been specifically designed for the niche they occupy and wouldn't need to adapt. Really, I don't need to read further, because this is a false assumption based on nothing but an assumed worldview. In other words, you reject another possible framework because it doesn't fit your assumed, baseless, and arbitrary framework. Circular thinking.
161 posted on
08/22/2011 6:35:42 AM PDT by
MrB
(The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
162 posted on
08/22/2011 6:43:44 AM PDT by
FourPeas
("Maladjusted and wigging out is no way to go through life, son." -hg)
To: MrB
Really, I don't need to read further, because this is a false assumption based on nothing but an assumed worldview. In other words, you reject another possible framework because it doesn't fit your assumed, baseless, and arbitrary framework. Circular thinking. You are just plain rude.
I put a lot of thought and effort into making that reply, because an honest answer to the question required it and couldn't be delivered through a flippant comment.
You should have stated up front that you had no intention of even reading any response that doesn't support your preconceived opinion; it would have saved me an hour of effort.
The least you can do if someone is going to take time to make a thoughtful reply to you is read it. Even if you disagree with it.
163 posted on
08/22/2011 6:55:30 AM PDT by
exDemMom
(Now that I've finally accepted that I'm living a bad hair life, I'm more at peace with the world.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson