Replies

As expected, you have confused the issue. I make few comments and sometimes leave a remark concerning those who whine about people who post articles that have already been posted. That is a big difference than complaining about a post that is irrelevant as this one is.

Yes, I know I can skip it and I almost always do, but sometimes I read the posts on the birther issue. I can do that and do it without your permission, too.

I can also leave my thoughts and if you don't like it, I don't care either.

I'm just pointing out that I think it is best for you and others to spend your energy on something that can make a difference. Frankly, the birther issue is discredited and will no longer receive any traction in any meaningful manner. So you can puff yourself up and feel important that you are trying to make a difference, but you are not. Spend time on something that can make a difference.

The natural born citizen clause in the Constitution has been the subject of several attempts to remove it by proposed Amendments to the Constitution in the last fifteen years. Consequently, the question of any President's natural born citizenship can not be "discredited" as you claim, so long as the clause remains in the Constitution. Any person who has sworn an oath to protect and defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic, is obligated by oath to defend the natural born citizen clause.

By attempting to argue that the natural born citizens clause is "discredited," you are effectively saying that piece of the Constitution is "discredited" along with any person who would act to protect and defend it. It may be argued that any person who says the natural born citizen clause is "discredited" is by self-definition declaring themselves to be a foreign or domestic enemy of the Constitution to the extent of which they seek to nullify and overthrow that part of the Constitution without a lawful Amendment to repeal the clause.

Is it your intent to declare yourself a domestic enemy of the Constitution, the natural born citizen clause, and the people who are sworn by oath to protect and defend it?

I'm just pointing out that I think it is best for you and others to spend your energy on something that can make a difference.

Please tells me WTF makes you think you are so well knowing that you have the right to tell others what YOU think is best for a group of people??? Get a hobby, or a puppy, because your tact (and opinionated directions) sucks. A free thinking society need not ask for your derogatory remarks about the subject.

Sorry everyone else...I rarely post, but this statement was so idiotic I had to vomit or post something...