Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Kaslin
Why is it necessary for everybody involved in these discussions to go off-topic, or to dive into the cloud of divesionary dust flung into the air by the scoundrels and their media enablers to keep us from seeing... or discussing, the actual issue at hand?

Let's cut to the chase.

We'll begin by stating, then setting aside, the obvious.

1) Obama and Holder want to take away our guns. We know this because their various arms-related organs are using guns in their current sub-rosa operations. The only reason these anti-gun stinkpots ever touch, talk about, or have anything to do with guns is when they are cooking up another assault on our 2nd Amendment.

2) The current "flood Mexico with American guns" ploy is intended to generate outrage from Mexico which Obama and Holder can then use as an excuse for executive orders about new gun control and, if "needed", imposing Martial Law. The likely end result being attempts to seize American's firearms.

3) Why is it so important, right now, to get all these players and plots into motion? What is coming up in a little over a year? Why, it's a presidential election! What a coincidence.

Okay, we've used our acknowledgment of the obvious to steer us toward what we should be discussing right now, which is "Why do the power-grabbing 'recreate-America-in-our-Leftist-Progressive-Image' filth need to do all this right now?

We know that Obama's plan is to collapse the entire American capitalist-financial system so it can be replaced with the new Progressive model. We know that everything he is doing, and has done to "fix" the current crisis has only made is exponentially worse. That he insists on ignoring the time-tested measures for actually resolving such issues and instead implementing more destructive charades is a clear, and clearly probitive, pattern.

Up until a year ago, the Progressives had pretty smooth sailing ahead. They owned both houses of Congress and the White House. Mr. Barry Mack Daddy was well on his way to packing the Supreme Court with radical socialist activist pseudo-legislators. George Soros and his minions were getting leftist agents elected to Secretary of State roles in all the key electoral states in the Union (these are, conveniently enough, the folks at the Statewide level who "certify" State-by-State election results).

Not that this was the plan, but if you had a ratbag thug in the White House who wanted to impose un-constitutional Socialist policies on a Sovereign Republic, and your main tool for stealing elections (let's use "ACORN" for this hypothetical) had recently been castrated by a sleuth filmmaker, what could you do to ensure that no future elections ended up like last November's ass whupping rejection of you and your putrid ilk?

Why, you'd pack the Secretary of State positions with more complicit activists!

But what if the people sued for justice?

You could pack the Supreme Court!

Now you've covered all your socialist progressive takeover bases, right?

Wrong. One potential fly is still crapping in the ointment (or on your lip with the cameras rolling, as the case may be...).

These unwashed heathens still have their damn guns.

Okay, enough with the ridiculous tinfoil hat hypotheticals. We all know that there is NO WAY that this is what's taking place right under our noses. It's just one of those 397-billion-to-one against-the-odds coincidences that all of these facts are coming together at precisely the same time, just a little over one year before the next election.

I mean, come on people. Get real.

;^\

20 posted on 07/16/2011 9:42:27 AM PDT by Gargantua ("Dorky One"... FR's Champion, rescuing boy-damsels in distress...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Gargantua
Well gundog puts the blame on Boehner and it's not even is his committees and his gune issue ratings are quite good

2010  Representative Boehner supported the interests of the 2010 Buckeye Firearms Association A percent in 2010.

2010  In 2010 Gun Owners of America - April Ratings gave Representative Boehner a grade of 82.

2010  In 2010 Gun Owners of America - Candidate Ratings gave Representative Boehner a grade of A.

2010  In 2010 the National Rifle Association Political Victory Fund gave Representative Boehner a grade of A.

2009  In 2009 Gun Owners of America gave Representative Boehner a grade of A-.

2008  In 2008 National Rifle Association gave Representative Boehner a grade of A, in its scorecard for candidates seeking office in 2008.

2007  In 2007 Gun Owners of America gave Representative Boehner a grade of A-.

2006  Representative Boehner supported the interests of the Gun Owners of America 100 percent in 2006.

2006  Based on lifetime voting records on gun issues and the results of a questionnaire sent to all Congressional candidates in 2006, the National Rifle Association assigned Representative Boehner a grade of A (with grades ranging from a high of A+ to a low of F).

2005  Representative Boehner supported the interests of the Gun Owners of America 50 percent in 2005.

2004  Based on lifetime voting records on gun issues and the results of a questionnaire sent to all Congressional candidates in 2004, the National Rifle Association assigned Representative Boehner a grade of A (with grades ranging from a high of A+ to a low of F).

2003-2004  Representative Boehner supported the interests of the Gun Owners of America 70 percent in 2003-2004.

2003  Representative Boehner supported the interests of the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence 5 percent from 1988-2003 (Senate) or 1991-2003 (House).

2003  Representative Boehner supported the interests of the Coalition to Stop Gun Violence 0 percent in 2003.

2003  In 2003 Gun Owners of America gave Representative Boehner a grade of 70.

2002  On the votes that the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence considered to be the most important as of 2002, Representative Boehner voted their preferred position 5 percent of the time. These scores are cumulative for each representative's time in their current office. The Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence considered votes from 1988-2002 in the House and 1991-2002 in the Senate when determining these scores.

2002  Based on lifetime voting records on gun issues and the results of a questionnaire sent to all Congressional candidates in 2002, the National Rifle Association assigned Representative Boehner a grade of A (with grades ranging from a high of A+ to a low of F).

2001-2002  Based on the results of a questionnaire the Gun Owners of America assigned Representative Boehner a grade of 0 (with grades ranging from a high of A+ to a low of F-).

2001  Representative Boehner supported the interests of the Coalition to Stop Gun Violence 0 percent in 2001.

2000  Based on lifetime voting records on gun issues and the results of a questionnaire sent to all Congressional candidates in 2000, the National Rifle Association assigned Representative Boehner a grade of A+ (with grades ranging from a high of A+ to a low of F).

1999-2000  Representative Boehner supported the interests of the Coalition to Stop Gun Violence 0 percent in 1999-2000.

1999-2000  Based on the results of a questionnaire the Gun Owners of America assigned Representative Boehner a grade of 0 (with grades ranging from a high of A+ to a low of F-).

1993-1994  Representative Boehner supported the interests of the National Rifle Association 100 percent in 1993-1994.

1991-2009  Representative Boehner supported the interests of the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence 4 percent between 1991-2009.

1990-1996  On the votes that the Coalition to Stop Gun Violence considered to be the most important in 1990-1996 , Representative Boehner voted their preferred position 0 percent of the time.

1988-2008  Based on lifetime voting records on gun issues and the results of a questionnaire sent to all candidates from 1988-2008, the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence assigned Representative Boehner a grade of 4 percent.

1987-1999  Representative Boehner supported the interests of the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence 7 percent in 1987-1999.

27 posted on 07/16/2011 10:01:33 AM PDT by Kaslin (Acronym for OBAMA: One Big Ass Mistake America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: Gargantua

No tinfoil hat needed there; you laid it all out very clearly.


32 posted on 07/16/2011 10:20:50 AM PDT by zzeeman ("We can evade reality, but we cannot evade the consequences of evading reality.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson