Page 168 of 182
1973 Individual Income Tax Return, State of Hawaii.
EXEMPTIONS: Line 2: First names and ages of your dependent children, give address if they did not live with you.
Maya
Enter number of children named: 1
SAD Soetoro lost custody of BHO II in 1970 when he returned to Hawaii, alone. BHO’s II SSN application was filed by his case manager of the American Resettlement Organization located in Connecticut because they had legal custody of him throughout the 1970’s.
It has always been a mystery of ‘who had legal guardianship and custody after the Christmas 1970 return. The only thing that seemed to make sense was that the Grandparents would have custody. Without it would they agree to take on the responsibility of raising a child with on parent in Indonesia and the other absentee parent since day one in Kenya? It would not make sense. It would seem they would want clear, concise, legal custody.
So how does ARO work? Do they take legal guardianship and then ensure the child has a ‘foster’ home such as the grandparents? Is Obama really this ‘family-less’ in the early 1970s?
EXEMPTIONS: Line 2: First names and ages of your dependent children, give address if they did not live with you.
Maya
Enter number of children named: 1
That is a bit of evidence that supports your theory. At the moment I find it highly plausible.
BUT, ain't all the squawk 'bout 'the fact' that somebody else was previously issued the SS# in question!?
The American Resettlement Organization resettles foreign refugees. Are you saying BHO was an Indonesian refugee? This could explain the Connecticut SS#. Do you have any evidence to link?
>>Page 168 of 182
>>1973 Individual Income Tax Return, State of Hawaii.
>>EXEMPTIONS: Line 2: First names and ages of your dependent children, give address if they did not live with you.
>>Maya
>>Enter number of children named: 1
>...the American Resettlement Organization located in Connecticut ... had legal custody of him throughout the 1970s.
If its possible to see the 1973 tax return of Stanley Ann, and little Barry was not her exemption but Maya WAS, then why didn’t the same researcher go one step further and look at the 1973 tax return of Stanley Ann’s parents?
They’re both dead too, and not protected by privacy laws.
I’d believe this theory a little more if the researcher was to float an image of the 1973 SAD tax return.
Any freepers willing to FOIA the grandparent’s 1973 return? Not that it will matter now because Barry’s thugs read these threads and it will now be off limits for privacy reasons.
Also, why would her STATE income tax form be 182 pages? State filings are usually much smaller than federal. If this is legit, and publicly available, it might shed a lot of light into the true history of SAD, since we really can’t believe anything Barry says about her.
I would more likely believe that the grandparents tax return WILL show little barry (or maybe he had yet another different name then) on their tax return because the grandmother leaked that they adopted this orphan boy after his mother died in 1970.
<.< >.>
What? Where did this come from??