Fair enough, I can see that argument. It doesn't address why they didn't expunge the references from the other law archives, like FindLaw. And it ignores the fact that the citation in Boyd does not quote the definition of NBC from Minor, so someone looking for that wouldn't have found Boyd anyway. And anyone looking for cases dealing with citizenship and eligibility would have found their way to Boyd and then, via the link, to Minor. The fact that this alleged deletion would have had such a negligible effect still makes me doubt it was an intentional attempt to scrub info, but I know you're a collector of anomalies, so I can see why this appeals to you.
Maybe they don’t yet control all of the legal sources.
The point isn’t whether a person would eventually get to Minor v Happersett, but that a person wouldn’t be able to know all the different places where the logic of Minor was used as a precedent.
But the even bigger point as of now is this whole thing that nobody knows what source is going to do what manipulations. And when a source does a manipulation and gets caught then the sources just need to work together to make it appear as if there are other non-Obama-related instances where the same thing happened - in order to frame honest people as crazy. Way Back Machine is a Google thing, and in a recent post I showed that Google is screwing with us too. Somebody accused Donofrio of manipulating a screenshot. I doubt Donofrio has the ability to do that, but Google and Way Back Machine certainly would - and Google has shown a willingness to screw around with us.
They’re trying to create a disconnect from reality. If you knew that Google, Justia, the SCOTUS docket, etc were all willing to screw around, exactly what would you put past them? How would you find information you could trust?
People are talking about why people believe in “conspiracy theories”. My question for everybody is why - when we’ve seen the manipulations and outright lies by SO MANY DIFFERENT SUPPOSEDLY-TRUSTWORTHY SOURCES (including multiple government agencies at all different levels) - we should believe the supposedly-credible sources. And if we have nobody we can trust to tell us the truth and not mess around with the information, what’s left? We’re all left to our own ways of trying to figure things out. Anything goes.
That’s why this is serious business. In the past I’ve talked about the implications for the rule of law, and that is critical. But these people are delving even deeper. What they are doing are psy-ops like the military and/or cops use to break down the resistance of an enemy. Obama recognizes that people who care about truth are enemies. He has to disable us by getting us to a point where we can’t know truth, nobody can do anything about it even if we know it, and we are so divided and distracted that we don’t stop him before he destroys this country.
He’s trying to create scenarios where people will shut out anything that is said because they can’t know if it’s true anyway. That’s what disinformation agents are for - to create a situation where nobody can trust anybody else because we have no way of knowing who is true and who is jerking us around, and wouldn’t have time to dig through it all even if we COULD find out the truth.
IOW, he’s trying to come between every person and every other person. Now THAT is invasive. It’s corrosive. It is literally mind control on a massive scale. And until we recognize the level to which it is being done and actually find some consequences for those who do it, it will continue to be very effective. It’s the equivalent of setting a stink-bomb in the jewelry store so everybody gets so disgusted they leave, and the place is free to be ransacked.
“Fair enough, I can see that argument. It doesn’t address why they didn’t expunge the references from the other law archives, like FindLaw”
I can answer that for you easily. Findlaw was originally founded by Tim Stanley. He sold it to West Publishing for 37 Million and got a 200K salary and stayed on as an employee. Well the new owners and Stanley didn’t see eye to eye, and Stanley got sued for Breech of Contract. tha tcase got settled, but Findlaw and Justia are not buddies.
Whoever messed with Justia’s site had access to Justia’s code. NOT the code of other sites. Whoever made the changes had access to Justia. Thats why you do not see it elsewhere. But keep im mind, Stanley said that the “error” affected their entire Supreme Court Server...