Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Mad Dawgg

When you state...

“Or is your true purpose to get Jim Robinson and FreeRepublic.com in more legal trouble?”

You are implying that I have gotten JR & FR in legal trouble in the past.

This is not true - and it is an accusation, albeit, a rather womanly one.

++++++++++

“Which BTW is a clear violation of Copyright law.”

The internet pretty much is one big, “violation of Copyright law”. If Neoavatara comes here pushing his wares - in repeated violation of Jim Rob’s wishes (see above - look it up) then I see nothing wrong with someone giving him a taste of his own medicine.

Incidentally, who ordained you the protector and legal counsel for blog pimps?

+++++++++++++++

You ever hear the term “Fair Use”?

“In its most general sense, a fair use is any copying of copyrighted material done for a limited and “transformative” purpose, such as to comment upon, criticize, or parody a copyrighted work. Such uses can be done without permission from the copyright owner. In other words, fair use is a defense against a claim of copyright infringement. If your use qualifies as a fair use, then it would not be considered an illegal infringement.”
http://fairuse.stanford.edu/Copyright_and_Fair_Use_Overview/chapter9/9-a.html

Being that this thread is comments about the stated article...

I’ll let you figure it out.


84 posted on 06/29/2011 10:15:06 PM PDT by PetroniusMaximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: PetroniusMaximus

It appears that post #84 has shut the blog pimp police down for the evening....lol


85 posted on 06/29/2011 10:39:22 PM PDT by superfries
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies ]

To: PetroniusMaximus; Jim Robinson; Lead Moderator; John Robinson
“In its most general sense, a fair use is any copying of copyrighted material done for a limited and “transformative” purpose, such as to comment upon, criticize, or parody a copyrighted work."

Great defense but since Free Republic already has lost using that one it shows once again you are three steps behind...

Try and keep up...

You are flailing about trying to find purchase in a rational defense of your call for someone other than the copyright holder to copy the article in full and post it on Free Republic.

Let me save you some time, there isn't one.

Further RE: "You are implying that I have gotten JR & FR in legal trouble in the past." Shows once again you are clueless when it comes to reading comprehension which seems to be a predominant trait of those that call themselves the Blog Pimp Police.

Bottom Line you tried to get someone to violate Copyright law which puts My beloved Free Republic in more legal jeopardy. You do realize there are literally thousands of lefties who are looking for an opening to shut down Free Republic don't you? So, when I see some nimrod working to give those Free Republic haters and opening to do such I am going to make sure Jim and John are aware as well as the mods. You May wish to take such into consideration when posting more of your lamea$$ BlogPimp Police drivel.

Nuff said...

Next Subject...

Mad Dawgg

86 posted on 06/30/2011 4:54:08 AM PDT by Mad Dawgg (If you're going to deny my 1st Amendment rights then I must proceed to the 2nd one...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson