Skip to comments.
Time magazine cover features shredded U.S. Constitution, asks if it still matters
The Daily Caller ^
| 23 Jun 2011
| Jeff Poor
Posted on 06/23/2011 3:19:16 PM PDT by mandaladon
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
Seeing what Obama and his cohorts have done to our country...I would say the Constitution doesn't matter to them.
To: mandaladon
Time Magazine means a lot less today than it once did. Newsweek even less than Time.
2
posted on
06/23/2011 3:21:50 PM PDT
by
Mobties
(Reduce the government footprint! Let the markets work!)
To: mandaladon
Make a trip to the store and shake out the subscription cards and drop for processing. Send a message.
3
posted on
06/23/2011 3:23:27 PM PDT
by
samadams2000
(Someone important make......The Call!)
To: mandaladon
QUICK! We NEED a photo of TIME magazine in the toilet!
4
posted on
06/23/2011 3:23:59 PM PDT
by
jaz.357
(Find a way or make one.)
To: mandaladon
Saw a picture of the cover this morning. I’m sure TIME thinks its ok to shred the Constitution, that is, all except the amendments they like.
5
posted on
06/23/2011 3:24:53 PM PDT
by
MizSterious
(Apparently, there's no honor when it comes to someone else's retirement funds.)
To: mandaladon
To: mandaladon
reminds me of “We Are All Socialists Now” from Newsweak
7
posted on
06/23/2011 3:25:59 PM PDT
by
GeronL
(The Right to Life came before the Right to Happiness)
To: mandaladon
The constitution is the federal government's limited power of attorney from the citizens of the U.S. Without it they no authority to act in our behalf.
8
posted on
06/23/2011 3:27:13 PM PDT
by
oldbrowser
(Breitbart for a Pulitzer Prize)
To: mandaladon
“They (the founders) argued both sides of the most powerful issues in American history slavery, states rights, central government. So to say that what did the framers want is kind of a crazy question, I have to say. I write about that in the piece.
Yes, asking “what did the framers want” is kind of a crazy question.
Luckily we Constitutionalists don’t pay much attention to what the founders wanted - we pay attention to the CLEAR MEANING OF WORDS in what they wrote.
What a simpleton.
9
posted on
06/23/2011 3:27:26 PM PDT
by
allmendream
(Tea Party did not send the GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism.)
To: mandaladon
To me the Constitution is a guardrail. Its for when we are going off the road and it gets us back on. Its not a traffic cop that keeps us going down the center. He has it exactly backwords. It's not to keep "us" from going off the road. It's to keep the government from going off the road. And the government has been off-roading for quite some time now.
10
posted on
06/23/2011 3:28:08 PM PDT
by
TaxPayer2000
(The United States shall guarantee to every state in this union a republican form of government,)
To: jaz.357
QUICK! We NEED a photo of TIME magazine in the toilet!Or a photoshop job of James Madison putting a copy of Time magazine through a shredder.
To: mandaladon
12
posted on
06/23/2011 3:30:09 PM PDT
by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: GeronL
It sounds to me like you are not with the “new program”, perhaps a “reactionary” that needs to attend a “re-education camp” along with all of your friends and family and anybody you have had contact with in the last 2.5 years. Carry on Comrade!/sarc
13
posted on
06/23/2011 3:41:46 PM PDT
by
Mikey_1962
(Obama: The Affirmative Action President. How else could he beat Hillary?)
To: mandaladon
I would say the real question is why does TIME ask? What are they leading up to? Will they push for Zero to disregard the Constitution and forgo elections? Are they trying to soften us up for a permanent Zero administration? Are they trying to tell the Zero followers what the next step is?
14
posted on
06/23/2011 3:44:54 PM PDT
by
jeffc
(Prayer. It's freedom of speech.)
To: mandaladon
Matters to me. I am sworn to defend it. And will.
15
posted on
06/23/2011 3:45:27 PM PDT
by
screaminsunshine
(Socialism...Easier said than done.)
To: Mikey_1962
16
posted on
06/23/2011 3:45:35 PM PDT
by
GeronL
(The Right to Life came before the Right to Happiness)
To: jeffc
Are they trying to soften us up for a permanent Zero administration? Are they trying to tell the Zero followers what the next step is? Of course, along with most of the rest of the socialist presstitutes. Their motto is "By any means necessary."
To: mandaladon
The asshat LIB/DIM/Progressive moonbats really fry me. Their views and actions are anti-Free-America and anti-logical. These self-loathing morons should choose to leave this earth.
18
posted on
06/23/2011 3:51:34 PM PDT
by
hal ogen
( of Rights.)
To: GeronL
I probably am, lol No need for confession at this point.
The regime will tell you when to confess and exactly what your confession should be.
After seing what these guys are capable of, it is no longer a joke.
Look at Boeing: the #1 exporter in this country and they are going to cancel a new 1 Billion dollar plant.
You can't make this crap up.
19
posted on
06/23/2011 3:52:41 PM PDT
by
Mikey_1962
(Obama: The Affirmative Action President. How else could he beat Hillary?)
To: jeffc
why does TIME ask? What are they leading up to? They want a rewrite of the Constitution, and the Time editors will obligingly do it as a "public service".
20
posted on
06/23/2011 3:54:32 PM PDT
by
Navy Patriot
(Holy flippin' crap, Sarah rocks the world!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson