Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Jacquerie
From Madison's point of view, it was important to deny state government any influence over the "first house", because it was to be a national house. There the Representatives would not represent states at all, but people residing in separate national legislative districts superimposed on states by the national government.

This house was to be a check on state power. It was designed to be a rival to the states (who would have their own house, to lend a confederate air to the centralizing project.)

Shall we read later who pays the Senators and where Messers Madison and Hamilton came down on that question? Anyone want to hazard a guess?

5 posted on 06/22/2011 7:08:07 AM PDT by Huck (The Antifederalists were right!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Huck

Popular election to the first house passed 9-1. Madison was hardly alone.


8 posted on 06/22/2011 11:00:25 AM PDT by Jacquerie (Christianity is the heart of our culture. To destroy America, destroy Christianity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson