Posted on 06/12/2011 5:52:28 AM PDT by South40
The media went crazy thinking they were going to find a smoking gun on Governor Palin by forcing the State of Alaska to release 24,199 pages of email communications during her time in office. They were wrong and have admitted as much. After the media spent so much time and effort, they discovered no “bombshells,” which of course they were hoping for all along.
To save face, the media has now begun an effort to spin any small excerpt from the emails to try and damage Governor Palin any way they can, just as we predicted they would do last Thursday. They have begun to pick out a sentence here and a sentence there in an effort to substantiate previous memes they themselves created or borrowed from far-left bloggers.
What the press does not realize is that they’ve exposed their own pathetic bias. By taking part in this witch-hunt, the media exposed themselves as nothing more than a politically driven, organized group of DNC opposition researchers.
WHAT WE NEED FROM YOU: The media is cherry-picking small excerpts to highlight, but they are leaving the bulk of the 24,199 pages out of their reports. That’s where you come in…
We need to gather links from the email database that prove what kind of leader Governor Palin really is. We need to find the stuff the media doesn’t want the public to know about. We want to show the stuff they aren’t reporting but is still available online. The media wanted to “expose” what kind of executive Governor Palin was while in office… So, let us oblige them! We need your help collecting and archiving excerpts.
(Excerpt) Read more at conservatives4palin.com ...
Time for all the phony emails to start popping up in the media... Good & Bad!
I don’t think so.
Every lie they tell will just reinforce their lack of credibility.
Fake stories will be page one, retractions, if published will be “page 9.”
Good Link.. Thanks... Funny....
“From: BarackO’Bama@chicagowaywhitehouse.gov
To: Rahmfather1@ChiCityHall.com
Rahm, dude, the media’s on my case again, reporters are asking me to release all the emails between you, me, Rich and Billy when we planned the mayoral switcheroo in Chicago. And they want those minutes from the Fannie Mae board, back when you served on it, before this “housing bubble” thing exploded. Dude, you’re my old chief of staff. So what in the name of Transparency, Open Government and Transcending-the-Broken-Politics-of-the-Past should I do? B.”
Nice collection of email excerpts at the C4P site already. No wonder the establishment doesn’t like her.
This should save some time for the docents at the Sarah Palin Presidential Museum
I happened to see NBC’s “investigative reporter,” Michael Isikoff last week, doing an arrival story (before he’d had a chance to dig into the email.) He was literally drooling over the prospect of finding dirt.
NBC News sent him three thousand miles for nothing. Too bad they didn’t leave him there.
Of course, when you understand that NBC just hired the ex-editor at PBS, you’ll understand why.
From: gov.sarah@yahoo.com [mailto:gov.sarah@yahoo.com] Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2007 4:20 PM To: Spencer, Kari L (GOV) Subject: Re: Gov. Mitt Romney
What is his number? Since it may be partisan, I should do this without state assistance. Thanks!
——Original Message—— From: Spencer, Kari L (GOV) To: Governor Sarah Palin Sent : Jun 21, 2007 3:16 PM Subject: Gov. Mitt Romney
Governor Mitt Romney wants to schedule a 9:00am (AK time) call Monday with you to “catch up on things” …. Tibs says you probably wouldn’t be interested. How should I proceed? Sent from my BlackBerrya device from Cellular One
This reminds me of Al Capone’s “Vault.”
I may be claimed that Palin avoided sensitive or controversial issues on the main, State e-mail account and reserved them for the other two private accounts that are being withheld from the public and have been blocked under Executive Privilege. (2700 e-mails)
They are also implying that there may be ethics issues attached to these private accounts because she conducted State business on them, had them paid for by the State and claimed they were for personal and non-state use only, when she may have violated that ethics rule on several separate issues.
Time will tell, but this is not over yet. There is more to come.
“ethics issues” ???? “ethics issues”???? Compared to what standards? Compared to what other politician? Compared to whoom?
Hey, there's always Obama's college records.
Sheeeyit. The press has been violating the country with their political crotch shots years before Weiner realized he even had one.
All this over a woman who has yet to declare that she is running, aka, a private citizen. Imagine the lunacy from the frothing at the mouth left once/if she does.
My imagination is not that creative. I can't wait.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.