“Then why post at all? The statement as you posit has zero meaning.”
Of course it has meaning. Seems to me like it means pretty much what I’ve been saying: your refusal to entertain the plausibility of worst-case scenarios doesn’t seem to be entirely reasonable.
>>Of course it has meaning. Seems to me like it means pretty much what I’ve been saying: your refusal to entertain the plausibility of worst-case scenarios doesn’t seem to be entirely reasonable.<<
So, you are really, with a straight face, suggesting that the entire world will break down and we will, inside of our generation, be thrown back to an agrarian society and culture? No technology, no manufacturing (even if imported or exported), no imports nor exports. Just each of us tending our mini-farms with sentries on the roof to keep our gold and food safe?
>>Of course it has meaning. Seems to me like it means pretty much what I’ve been saying: your refusal to entertain the plausibility of worst-case scenarios doesn’t seem to be entirely reasonable.<<
Oh, and what will we do with the 10 million people in L.A., the 18 million in NY, the 10 million in Chicago, etc. etc. etc. They will all be magically gone? Or will they go to where the food is and maybe take it?