>>Only you’re accusing those preparing for possible disruptions as being “kooks”.<<
Read my response and then your post. I am 100% sure I did not use the term “kooks.” You, OTOH, “accused” me of having “the bias of normalcy.” I admit was my implication that you were mocking me for that, and thus attempting to elevate yourself above said “normalcy.” I am certain I am not alone in seeing that as the sniffing self-importance of one who is above normalcy. My question of what group of people also see “the bias of normalcy” as a lesser set of people is not out of line.
You realize that these posts are here for all to see, right? This is easy stuff to prove. And disprove.
I’m pretty sure that what little jeremiah meant by “bias of normalcy” was a bias toward the assumption that the world will go on as normal, that there will be no drastic changes.
I’m confident that there was no imputation of an inferior status.