Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

And you can add the new numbers from Iowa and the Reuter's poll where she actually leads Romney by 2%.
1 posted on 06/09/2011 3:02:11 AM PDT by GonzoII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]



Direct You Tube Link to Video: American Foundations


2 posted on 06/09/2011 3:03:03 AM PDT by GonzoII (Quia tu es, Deus, fortitudo mea...Quare tristis es anima mea?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GonzoII

And she’s not even running...yet.


3 posted on 06/09/2011 3:08:00 AM PDT by skr (May God confound the enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GonzoII

Ineluctable


5 posted on 06/09/2011 3:21:58 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (The USSR spent itself into bankruptcy and collapsed -- and aren't we on the same path now?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GonzoII

I think that a lot of people look at the head-to-head numbers between Obama and Palin and they think that he’d clobber her. I don’t believe that for a second. If you understand human nature, especially when it comes to politics, those numbers are pretty much worthless.

Here’s why. If someone is a Romney, Pawlenty, or Bachmann supporter, and they are asked how they would vote in a contest between Obama and each of the GOP candidates, there is a very strong chance that they would say that they would vote for Obama over Palin. It’s human nature to try to make your candidate’s most feared rival look as bad as possible.

At this point in time, does anyone believe that Palin would lose such a large number of the people who voted for McCain? Does anyone believe that everyone who voted for Obama in 2008 would vote for him again in 2012?

You must question motivation of the pollster and of the polled. I can’t believe that a pollster thinks that the head-to-head numbers are of any value at all, except to drive public perception.


6 posted on 06/09/2011 3:37:17 AM PDT by RefudiateObama2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GonzoII
First... Palin is and has been much stronger than reported... they tried ignoring and lying about her but that does not work. They did this to Reagan... carter was a shoe-in... I remember the tortured screams and confused looks and tormented souls of the media wailing and gnashing teeth when Reagan's returns shown a landslide... peter jennings declared, “America had a temper tantrum”. Same as it ever was.

LLS

9 posted on 06/09/2011 4:39:30 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer (WOLVERINES... a Conservative subsidiary of Reagan's party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GonzoII

Don’t be silly.

Palin is not running, just collecting money while she can (sources: the Romney campaign, the mainstream media, and the White House)

Palin is not serious.

Palin is not smart.

Palin is not qualified.

Palin is not really the mother of her baby, but she is getting divorced, she doesn’t know where Africa is, nor does she know the difference between North and South Korea, she’s a bad mother who is dragging her unwilling daughter along on a campaign trip, she’s a greedy politician who is using campaign funds to support a vacation with her daughter, she’s getting special treatment from the Park Service in violation of federal law, she’s abusing the flag to raise funds, she’s a diva, she’s a RINO, she doesn’t know where Russia is, Palin is divisive (despite the 88% support she had as governor), Palin doesn’t even know Longfellow’s work and foolishly refers to the version of events told in Paul Revere’s letter rather than the authoritative poetic rendering of history, and she’s not even news [the best supported attack of all, since there are more than 10,000 GoogleNews hits a day confirming that she’s not news].


10 posted on 06/09/2011 5:20:05 AM PDT by Pollster1 (Natural born citizen of the USA, with the birth certificate to prove it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: onyx

PING THE PALIN POSSE!!


12 posted on 06/09/2011 2:14:26 PM PDT by penelopesire (Let The Congressional Hearings Begin!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GonzoII
Here are two awesome radio interviews with Stephen Bannon about the documentary:

Monica Crowley Interviews Stephen Bannon about "The Undefeated"

Rita Crosby Interviews Stephen Bannon about his Palin film, "The Undefeated"


13 posted on 06/09/2011 9:14:25 PM PDT by meadsjn (Sarah 2012, or sooner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GonzoII
Here are two awesome radio interviews with Stephen Bannon about the documentary:

Monica Crowley Interviews Stephen Bannon about "The Undefeated"

Rita Crosby Interviews Stephen Bannon about his Palin film, "The Undefeated"


14 posted on 06/09/2011 9:14:36 PM PDT by meadsjn (Sarah 2012, or sooner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GonzoII
All of the potential GOP candidates have their negatives. In Palin's case, her main negative is the fact that she is well known (supposedly, more on that below) and suffers poor approval ratings.

However, unlike the major negatives for most other candidates, this is reversible. Romney, on the other hand, is saddled with Obamneycare and his flip-flops. Gingrich's problems are a byproduct of his very nature. Bachmann isn't going to magically gain executive experience in the next few months. And so on.

The fact is, Sarah Palin isn't as well known as the polling data indicates. A lot of people think they know Sarah Palin, but most of them know "Sarah Palin", the media caricature, not the real Sarah Palin. As I've been maintaining for some time now, the only real challenge Palin has to the Presidency is whether or not she can overcome her own doppleganger.

Frankly, I had counted on her skills as a retail politician to do this job during the primary campaign. Imagine my surprise to see it starting to happen before she even announces! The Undefeated changes the game by shifting the discussion back to the real Sarah Palin. The media orgy over her emails is a gift from her enemies that she is likewise getting a huge advantage out of.

Some of the sharper elements in the media see the 18-wheeler bearing down on them, and are trying to deflect it. "Oh, where oh where is the 'old' Sarah Palin?" they cry out. But this will fail too, because she's still there -- a Republican who nonetheless is an outsider in her own party, and who is reviled by the entrenched interests; someone who appeals to the public as a whole by pointing out our shared values and beliefs; someone who will work with whom she needs to to get her agenda accomplished, but does so by bringing them into her fold, not vice-versa.

16 posted on 06/16/2011 5:04:44 AM PDT by kevkrom (Imagine if the media spent 1/10 the effort vetting Obama as they've used against Palin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson