She is pro-choice for states, though.
Q: Why is Roe v. Wade a bad decision?
A: I think it should be a states’ issue not a federal government-mandated, mandating yes or no on such an important issue. I’m, in that sense, a federalist, where I believe that states should have more say in the laws of their lands and individual areas. Now, foundationally, it’s no secret that I’m pro-life that I believe in a culture of life is very important for this country. Personally that’s what I would like to see further embraced by America.
Source: 2008 CBS News presidential interview with Katie Couric Oct 1, 2008
You obviously have a problem distinguishing between an individual's personal beliefs and their political posture.
Believing that the decision regarding this issue belongs at the state level rather than at the federal level is in no way proof of a person's personal belief. Yet that is what you are insisting on. Frankly, it shows you to either be rather shallow and undiscerning in your thinking, or standing on bias and innuendo. Judging by your adamant disregard for logic, it's likely the latter.
One can be pro-life yet understand that eliminating Roe vs. Wade at the federal level, and subjecting further control to the states is a strong first step in the long road of eliminating abortion completely. But then again, that's an uncomfortable thought to one who's bias clouds their sensibilities...