Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sarah Palin: her actual abortion record and rhetoric is shocking to the conscience.
Pro Life Profiles ^ | unknown

Posted on 06/05/2011 10:07:28 AM PDT by jobim

As a Candidate whom Many Pro-lifers Would Like to Support: her actual abortion record and rhetoric is shocking to the conscience in that Sarah Palin:

- happily appointed in 2009 a Planned Parenthood board member to the Alaska Supreme Court

- indicates that chemical abortifacients that kill the youngest children should be legal

- distinguishes between her "personal" and public pro-life views (personally pro-life means officially pro-choice)
- rather than fighting for protection, Sarah indicates support even for public funding to kill some unborn children - whitewashes other candidates misleading millions to believe that pro-choice politicians are pro-life

- allows her name to be used in ads promoting even tax-funded embryonic stem cell "research"

- harms personhood by holding that "equal protection" should not apply to unborn children

- has never announced support for any state's personhood amendment nor the Federal Human Personhood Amendment

- opposes personhood by claiming that the majority can decide to legalize the killing of children.

In her vice-presidential acceptance speech Sarah said, "there is a time for politics and a time for leadership."1 During the above, which time was it for her? Sources below document Sarah Palin's tragic record and political rhetoric.

Summary:
Sarah Palin claims to be personally pro-life but her words and actions prove that she is officially pro-choice and stands against the God-given right to life of the unborn. Even if Roe v. Wade were reversed, Palin says she would still leave the decision to kill children to others.

(Excerpt) Read more at prolifeprofiles.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: abortion; palin; paul4kucinichtards; pds; pimp4romney; rhymeswithmitt; romneybotattack; romneybothere; romneyservesobama; romneyvspalin; romneyvspalin4soros; smellslikemitt; waronsarah; whenmittbotsattack
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 201-207 next last
To: mnehring
Why can't you simply answer the question?

Which other of our unalienable rights can the states alienate other than the supreme right, the right to live?

"...the Declaration of Independence is the RINGBOLT to the chain of your nation's destiny; so, indeed, I regard it. The principles contained in that instrument are saving principles. Stand by those principles, be true to them on all occasions, in. all places, against all foes, and at whatever cost." -- Frederick Douglass

101 posted on 06/05/2011 11:25:21 AM PDT by EternalVigilance (Some of us still 'hold these truths to be self-evident'..Enough to save the country? Time will tell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee Nana

A Mittwitt trying to paint Palin as pro-abortion!?!?!?! Wow, if that isn’t PK, I don’t know what is! Next thing you know, Palin will have been a part of Romneycare!


102 posted on 06/05/2011 11:26:53 AM PDT by rintense (The GOP elite & friends can pound sand.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

PKB
103 posted on 06/05/2011 11:28:34 AM PDT by rintense (The GOP elite & friends can pound sand.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: jobim

Ahh, I love the smell of desperation in the morning.


104 posted on 06/05/2011 11:28:54 AM PDT by TruJess
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

That’s a very nice round-up. Thank you.


105 posted on 06/05/2011 11:32:07 AM PDT by fightinJAG (I am sick of people adding their comments to titles in the title box. Thank you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: mnehring; GonzoII
Sounds like a good way to save lives until a Prolife Amendment is added to the Constitution.

Giving up every American constitutional principle that argues against child-killing is "a good way to save lives"? LOL...wow.

What good is another Constitutional Amendment to protect innocent human life when folks just ignore the multiple Amendments to that effect that we already have?

"No person shall be deprived of life without due process of law."

"No State shall deprive any person of life without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."

106 posted on 06/05/2011 11:32:53 AM PDT by EternalVigilance (Some of us still 'hold these truths to be self-evident'..Enough to save the country? Time will tell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: jobim

I’m not comfortable with Sarah Palin, but this attack is just silly. She is not pro choice. Period.


107 posted on 06/05/2011 11:33:39 AM PDT by Wolfstar ("If you would win a man to your cause, first convince him that you are his friend." Abraham Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rintense; Tennessee Nana

That’s all nonsense. No one at American Right to Life supports Romney. That’s laughable. Many of them were very active in the effort to fully expose him over the last four years.


108 posted on 06/05/2011 11:38:49 AM PDT by EternalVigilance (Some of us still 'hold these truths to be self-evident'..Enough to save the country? Time will tell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: Wolfstar

She is pro-choice for states, though.


109 posted on 06/05/2011 11:39:22 AM PDT by EternalVigilance (Some of us still 'hold these truths to be self-evident'..Enough to save the country? Time will tell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
I don't think you understand that Palin is correct about this.

The 10th amendment is the way to beat abortion.

Would you rather wait 40 years for a court to overturn Roe or have South Dakota or another state nullify abortion in their state?
110 posted on 06/05/2011 11:45:38 AM PDT by Minus_The_Bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

Thank you for posting that detailed information.


111 posted on 06/05/2011 11:50:49 AM PDT by Sola Veritas (Trying to speak truth - not always with the best grammar or spelling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: jobim
I guess putting supporting links for each claim as they go along is hard.
112 posted on 06/05/2011 11:52:34 AM PDT by RichInOC (Palin 2012: The Perfect Storm.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
Abortion should be states’ issue, not federal mandate

Q: Why is Roe v. Wade a bad decision?

A: I think it should be a states’ issue not a federal government-mandated, mandating yes or no on such an important issue. I’m, in that sense, a federalist, where I believe that states should have more say in the laws of their lands and individual areas. Now, foundationally, it’s no secret that I’m pro-life that I believe in a culture of life is very important for this country. Personally that’s what I would like to see further embraced by America.

Source: 2008 CBS News presidential interview with Katie Couric Oct 1, 2008


You obviously have a problem distinguishing between an individual's personal beliefs and their political posture.

Believing that the decision regarding this issue belongs at the state level rather than at the federal level is in no way proof of a person's personal belief. Yet that is what you are insisting on. Frankly, it shows you to either be rather shallow and undiscerning in your thinking, or standing on bias and innuendo. Judging by your adamant disregard for logic, it's likely the latter.

One can be pro-life yet understand that eliminating Roe vs. Wade at the federal level, and subjecting further control to the states is a strong first step in the long road of eliminating abortion completely. But then again, that's an uncomfortable thought to one who's bias clouds their sensibilities...

113 posted on 06/05/2011 11:55:17 AM PDT by bcsco (..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: jobim

None of these claims are documented. There are so many lies about Palin, don’t take anything you hear about her to heart without documentation. For me, she’s got enough documented problems.


114 posted on 06/05/2011 11:56:48 AM PDT by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jobim
One word:

Trig.

115 posted on 06/05/2011 11:59:31 AM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
"It's the destruction of the cornerstone of this free republic. "

So, overturning Roe under 10th Amendment auspices would be the destruction of the cornerstone of the republic?

Are you serious?

The only way you'll ever get what you want is a Constitution Amendment stating that from the time of conception a child is covered by the Bill of Rights.

And, that's one very long row to hoe. It's likely to never be achieved.

116 posted on 06/05/2011 12:04:44 PM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Minus_The_Bear

As per the requirement of Article VI, all officers of government, at every level, in every branch, swear to support the Constitution.

And the Constitution forbids the killing of innocent persons. It also imperatively demands that the states protect the innocent life of every person, and that they provide for the equal protection of the laws.

It’s not optional.


117 posted on 06/05/2011 12:05:04 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (Some of us still 'hold these truths to be self-evident'..Enough to save the country? Time will tell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: Sola Veritas; bcsco; Outlaw Woman; fightinJAG; jazusamo; jobim
". I want to hear a discussion, a thorough discussion, of her prolife stance. Why cannot she be brought into the fold, with Reagan, to fully support life Constitutionally?"-jobim comment post#1

Well, jobim, with over 110 replies to your request and question, what have you learned?

118 posted on 06/05/2011 12:06:31 PM PDT by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

Amen! I am about as prolife as ne can get however I know that the US ecomony and her downfall are front and center and without her the whole prolife agenda could be a moot point if we are owned by China.


119 posted on 06/05/2011 12:06:49 PM PDT by chris_bdba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing
Well, jobim, with over 110 replies to your request and question, what have you learned

He's obviously learned to keep his mouth shut. There are others who would do well to learn that.

120 posted on 06/05/2011 12:10:21 PM PDT by bcsco (..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 201-207 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson