Posted on 05/30/2011 10:24:32 PM PDT by Rational Thought
When I disparaged you before, I didn’t take into account what you mean to the people of Alaska, where despite your approval rating being around 36 percent, many would follow you to Scottsdale, Arizona, where you might be moving away from them. Nor did I consider what you mean to this country. So that it makes sense that you would tour it by riding across it in a bus. Probably in the front of the bus. Just like Rosa Parks. Because you’re kind of like a white Rosa Parks. Except you’ve taken it so far beyond what Ms. Parks ever dreamed of. Because she just rode the bus. But you own the bus. Or at least lease it. So that riffraff like Rosa won’t try to hog all the seats/attention.
snip
So I look forward to seeing you turn up in historical hotspots, like maybe colonial Williamsburg, which, as students of history like you know, is the place where you can take really cool tourist photos of Todd’s face in the stockade. That would be a hoot. Or maybe you could visit the historic Medieval Times in Baltimore, where Francis Scott Key famously composed “The Star Spangled Banner” while jousting for a tankard of mead. Wherever you go, I won’t be there physically. Gas is four bucks a gallon, and there’s no time, besides. I’ll be too busy fashioning my Palin hair-doll shrine which I hope to exhibit at your nominating convention. (I bought a lock of it from Brandon — he’s a collector.) But as Third Day so eloquently sang in your reality show theme song, I will, in spirit, “follow you there.” In fact, as your old patron once said of Osama bin Laden, I would follow you to the gates of hell, which is where I suspect your campaign is headed, if you ever formally launch one in between publicity tours. So here’s hoping all’s forgiven.
Your vassal, ML
Matt Leblanc, Matt Labash, who knew?
After the ride, Palin kept a low profile. She did not speak at the rally that followed the ride; she ate lunch with wounded veterans from Walter Reed Army Medical Center in a tent blocked off from the crowd. The Palins left the Mall in the early afternoon, destination unknown.
The way I see it, those hwo haven't willingly sold out have lived in the 'wink, wink' world of unfaithful politics and other relationships so casually for so long that their weaknesses are well known. Some have been threatened with being outed, infidelities or improprieties exposed, perhaps even criminal charges, and someone somewhere has done enough homework--or hired squadrons of others to do it for them--that the whole mess is collectively over a barrel of their own offal.
Those who aren't traitors willingly have been compromised and seek to save their own arses while they sell ours down the river.
May Almighty God reward them as they so richly deserve.
Rejected suitors, IMHO
I totally agree with everything you posted, but are you surprised? This is Chatsworth Osborn, Jr.s site, after all.
You have to love the comments to the article, tough. They took Matt to the woodshed.
That little white speck on the top of chicken $hi+...is the mainstream media...but it’s still chicken $hi+.
I’m under the impression that Daily caller is a Tucker Carlson creation..not 100% sure but I think this may be the case.. He’s a typical neocon..he’s had some disparaging comments about Sarah and I stopped reading that website a long time ago...rather spend my time reading interesting stuff here on FR.
Haters hate, it’s what they do. Eh, Matt?
The Weakly Standard is a neocon/RINO POS. It has no subscribers (recently sold for a song) and does nothing but bleed money.
It's pretty much a zombie periodical continues on because, somehow some people somewhere (Washington) some time ago thought it was important. It wasn't.
Bill Kristol, Fred Barnes and Mat Labash = the Three Stooges.
Forgetting whatever opinions one may have about Sarah Palin, this is simply a shoddy piece of writing. I think it aspires to be wit and/or satire, but fails to achieve anything higher than snark.
Frankly, if someone had written a piece like this about Obama, I’d be embarrassed as a conservative that such a person supposedly represented my point of view.
What I don’t understand is why The Daily Caller remains protected by other conservative websites. When are NewsBusters going to cover this biased, snarky, nonfactual crap?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.