The Weepy A:
About Dr. Neal Krawetz...
His basic Bio:
http://www.hackerfactor.com/about.php
His Books, Articles and White Papers:
http://www.hackerfactor.com/publications.php
Ping
Thats not what I heard
I think everyone is clear on my opinion of MissTickly, right? There’s no love lost between us.
Okay. I recently read an article on her blog about the seal on Obama’s short-form COLB as photographed by FactCheck.org. She has a valid point. That seal is debossed not embossed. In other words, it’s completely the opposite of what it should be. WTF? Hawaii uses an embossed seal which creates raised text and images, as evidenced by every other seal we’ve seen and by the law in Hawaii. The seal on his COLB has lowered text and images. She is not mistaken.
Check it out. Let me know if I’m missing something.
Anyone will to predict what the history books will say about the birth place of Obama and his superposed documentation 10 years from now?
Or even one year?
Lies and deceit cannot be maintained forever, they can repetitiously drone over and over hoping to find fertile minds to grow upon.
Nothing lasts forever, the truth will overcome, the lies will be revealed.
Why does your link not work?
Ping. This explains the technical reasons for the white text and much more.
What a laughable claim. There may have been no "intentional manipulation" but the trade-offs that resulted in the released PDF are extreme digital manipulations. Typewriters don't create crisp-edged characters of a single color, nor do ink pens.
While I can't rule out that the person scanning the document meant no harm, it is obvious that the person had no conception of how to scan a legal document whose authenticiy was going to be questioned. The person might just as well have copied the document by hand onto a dinner napkin.
What he doesn’t explain is why the name of hospital was changed ... there’s loads of info on the Internet about how he first listed one hospital and then another as his ‘official’ place of birth.
ALSO, I think maybe Obama WAS born in Hawai’i ... BUT not under the name “Barack Hussein Muhammad Obama. I propose that his birth name is Barry Dunham. His ADOPTIVE name [so he could attend school in Indonesia, a requirement that he be Indonesian is also verifiable] is Barry Soetoro.
EVERYONE is looking for the wrong name on a birth certificate and that’s why it cannot be ‘found.’ It’s not lost or misplaced. It’s listed under Soetoro or Dunham and NOT under Obama.
In one of his books, Obama ADMITS to changing his name to the more ‘exotic’ “Obama” because ‘the girls dug it.’
THEREFORE, unless he can prove that his name was LEGALLY CHANGED to Obama, he’s going under a FALSE/ASSUMED name ... and that’s probably a FELONY.
And in the USofA, we don’t want a FELON in the White House. Of course, in Islam, the more felonious, the better.
Would someone in Hawai’i do a bit of Dunham/Soetoro research, please?
first, i’m NOT a techie. but i absolutely agree with Tex-Con-Man, that the “layers” and Adobe stuff doesn’t prove anything. In fact, i agree with 99% of the above.
But, until the LFBC came out, i believed Obama was born in Hawaii. I am convinced the document is a fraud, for many reasons not addressed above.
Longbow, Steel Wolf, and even Jeff Winston (all of whom, i respect greatly, even if i disagree with them), have at least acknowledged and addressed these many other, much stronger anomolies. maybe they are correct, about the signatures of different resolutions/ pixel sizes, the words that curve next to words that don’t, etc.
but i foolishly still believe they are clear evidence of fraud.
the stuff above about layers, implying that is all that is wrong, is simply misleading at best.
and the 1 thing i disagree with above, is:
“Finally, birthers make their boldest claims when they hide behind anonymity.”
this is simply not true.
i have read court affidavits, by graphics experts, that
are certainly not anonymous. And other experts, that have posted on the internet, that are not anonymous. (one lady especially impressed me, with her experience.)
...the “expert” that was on Fox immediately after the LFBC was released, was a Canadian trade school graduate, with a previous history of Obama advocacy.
but again, i agree the “layers” prove nothing. but there are MANY more things that strongly suggest the LFBC is a fraud. ESPECIALLY in context. “anti-birthers” knock one or 2 items out, and claim victory. ignoring the clear evidence of coverup and fraud, that Satindoll has documented for years.
...missing page 11 of divorce papers, missing early years of SAD’s passport files, the Obama Sr papers that shows that his AGE on the LFBC is incorrect for 1961, and much more, should raise honest questions from ANY honest American, and make us MORE curious.
...so why is he posting this article about “layers”, that no one cares about now on either side, and making the provable false claim, that there are no experts willing to state their name, when many have done so, including in sworn affidavits under penalty of perjury?
Ok, so can we get an optimized scan of the college records now?
Troublemaker.
WTF???? is this true????
If so then this who "fake" -vs- "REAL+ controversy is moot.
If they can just create one NOW and call it an 'original; then all bets are off. They can create anything Obama WANTS IT TO SAY.
And what the hell were THE WAIVERS he had to sign?????
Isn't there any JOURNBLISTS in the USA??
Check out the stamp from the COLB: http://factcheck.org/Images/image/birth_certificate_images/birth_certificate_9.jpg
Note the “A” at the beginning of Alvin T Onaka in this picture.
There is no smiley face.
Here the A is not smiling. Not smiling at all.
Instead the A is actually weeping. I calls it the “Weepy A”.
Obviously shedding tears for the forgery that someone was forced to manufacture. Probably at gunpoint. Probably also with the threat of having their family lowered into a vat of crocodile sharks swimming in acid.
So when Obama went back and told him “Make with a forged long form this time or back into the acid with them!” the forger figured that they were getting away with it so they changed from a sad face to a happy face.
The Weepy A:
"The PDF released by the White House shows no sign of digital manipulation or alterations. I see nothing that appears to be suspicious. "
Mine: Bullshit.
He is wrong on every single point and this is a classic example of 'obfuscation'. He uses so many unrelated and convoulted 'explanations' the reader is left confused, unless he is another computer image evpert- like me.
NONE of his arguments make any sense, and he ignores the more damning points completely.
And they also said the LFBC was half handwritten and half typed.
Fukino [the former director of Hawaii's Department of Health] said, she wanted to inspect the files — and did so, taking with her the state official in charge of vital records. She found the original birth record, properly numbered, half typed and half handwritten, and signed by the doctor who delivered Obama, located in the filesWhole lotta lyin' goin' on.Source: msnbc
ML/NJ
Consider the stupidity of this statement.
If I print out the pdf supplied by the WH and then scan it myself, my original subject is authentic. But it's no different than if I scanned a three dollar bill. You can tell the "original" was a fraud from my scan.
ML/NJ
to nonsense BC analysis from a quack...
lol, Yep, this dork's a real expert: Krawetz is calling you out again
That all hinges on the Hawaii claim that they sent two certified copies and the WH implicit claim that both copies were released to the press, but one (on plain, non-hashed paper) only to AP, the other via B/W xerox copies, clueless eyewitnesses like Guthrie, and the obviously manipulated WH PDF.
But based on those assumptions, the layering is an aftereffect added by the WH because someone there was an idiot (there are idiots there but a lot more are clever socialists), or someone felt the need to obfuscate the released PDF.